Literature DB >> 18184571

Adaptation to natural binocular disparities in primate V1 explained by a generalized energy model.

Ralf M Haefner1, Bruce G Cumming.   

Abstract

Sensory processing in the brain is thought to have evolved to encode naturally occurring stimuli efficiently. We report an adaptation in binocular cortical neurons that reflects the tight constraints imposed by the geometry of 3D vision. We show that the widely used binocular energy model predicts that neurons dedicate part of their dynamic range to impossible combinations of left and right images. Approximately 42% of the neurons we record from V1 of awake monkeys behave in this way (a powerful confirmation of the model), while about 58% deviate from the model in a manner that concentrates more of their dynamic range on stimuli that obey the constraints of binocular geometry. We propose a simple extension of the energy model, using multiple subunits, that explains the adaptation we observe, as well as other properties of binocular neurons that have been hard to account for, such as the response to anti-correlated stereograms.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18184571      PMCID: PMC2344156          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  46 in total

1.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.

Authors:  D J Field
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  The binocular organization of simple cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The binocular organization of complex cells in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey.

Authors:  G F Poggio; B Fischer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Stereoscopic depth aftereffect produced without monocular cues.

Authors:  C Blakemore; B Julesz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  T Nikara; P O Bishop; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1968       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J R Bergen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity.

Authors:  G F Poggio; F Gonzalez; F Krause
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Understanding the cortical specialization for horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  29 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Pooled, but not single-neuron, responses in macaque V4 represent a solution to the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdolrahmani ا; Takahiro Doi; Hiroshi M Shiozaki; Ichiro Fujita
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A quantitative explanation of responses to disparity-defined edges in macaque V2.

Authors:  C E Bredfeldt; J C A Read; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Human vergence eye movements to oblique disparity stimuli: evidence for an anisotropy favoring horizontal disparities.

Authors:  H A Rambold; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Mechanisms underlying the transformation of disparity signals from V1 to V2 in the macaque.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Terminator disparity contributes to stereo matching for eye movements and perception.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 8.  Weighted parallel contributions of binocular correlation and match signals to conscious perception of depth.

Authors:  Ichiro Fujita; Takahiro Doi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Stereoscopic vision in the absence of the lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Graeme P Phillipson; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; A David Milner; Andrew J Parker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A micro-architecture for binocular disparity and ocular dominance in visual cortex.

Authors:  Prakash Kara; Jamie D Boyd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.