Literature DB >> 9240637

Treatment results and prognostic factors in 101 men treated for squamous carcinoma of the penis.

R Sarin1, A R Norman, G G Steel, A Horwich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was performed to assess the treatment outcome and prognostic factors in 101 men with invasive squamous carcinoma of the penis treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital between 1960-1990. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The tumor was confined to the glans penis (T1) in 79 patients, 82 were node negative (N0), and two patients had distant metastases at presentation. The histology was Grade 1 (G1) in 36, Grade 2 (G2) in 18, Grade 3 (G3) in 28, and unknown in 19 patients. Node-positive disease was commoner in patients with G3 (p = 0.02) or T2/3/4 tumors (p = 0.007). Treatment for the primary tumor was external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 59, interstitial brachytherapy in 13, and partial or total penectomy in 29 patients. The median dose, dose/fraction, and treatment time for EBRT was 60 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, and 46 days, respectively. Eighty patients received no inguinal node treatment, 13 had EBRT (4 with chemotherapy), and 8 underwent groin dissection at presentation.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.2 years (2 months-22 years), 56 patients died (penile cancer 31, intercurrent illness 23 and unknown cause 2), giving 10 year overall and cause-specific survival (CSS) of 39 and 57%, respectively. Adverse prognostic factors for CSS on univariate analysis were G3, ulcerative/fungating or T2/3/ 4 tumors, node positive, Jackson's Stage 2/3/4, and surgical treatment for the primary. All but the last two were significant independent prognostic factors for CSS on multivariate analysis. Penile or perineal recurrence or residual disease after initial treatment was seen in 36 out of 98 evaluable patients, giving a 10-year local failure rate (LFR) of 45%. Local failure after initial treatment was successfully salvaged in the majority (26 out of 36) of patients with further surgery or radiotherapy, and local control was achieved ultimately in 74 out of 77 T1, 7 out of 12 T2; 3 out of 3 T3, and 3 out of 5 T4 tumors. In the 44 evaluable patients with T1 tumors treated by EBRT the only adverse RT parameter approaching prognostic significance (p = 0.052) was a BED value corrected for recovery of <60 Gy (alpha/beta 10, K = 0.5 Gy/day, mean = 21 days).
CONCLUSION: Invasive squamous carcinomas of the penis carry a significant risk of loco-regional recurrence after initial radiotherapy and this can be successfully salvaged in most patients with further treatment. This mandates close follow-up to detect loco regional recurrence early.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9240637     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00068-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

Review 1.  Penile cancer: current therapy and future directions.

Authors:  G Sonpavde; L C Pagliaro; C Buonerba; T B Dorff; R J Lee; G Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  [Lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Diagnostic and prognostic significance as well as therapeutic benefit].

Authors:  H Borchers; G Jakse
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  [Penile cancer--aftercare with results. How much is necessary?].

Authors:  R Paul; H van Randenborgh; S Schöler; F May; R Hartung
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Contemporary management of penile cancer including surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy: an experience in Taiwan.

Authors:  Miao-Fen Chen; Wen-Cheng Chen; Chun-Te Wu; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Kwai-Fong Ng; Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  A dramatic case of genital radionecrosis.

Authors:  José Guzmán-Esquivel; Ivan Delgado-Enciso; Héctor Solano-Moreno
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update.

Authors:  Juanita Crook; Clement Ma; Laval Grimard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Survival Following Salvage Surgery after Failed Radiotherapy for Penile Cancer: A SEER-Based Study.

Authors:  Mahmoud I Khalil; Fei Wan; Ehab Eltahawy; Rodney Davis; Philippe E Spiess; Nabil K Bissada; Mohamed H Kamel
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-05-10

8.  Evaluation of sexual functions and sexual behaviors after penile brachytherapy in men treated for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Patrice Njomnang Soh; Boris Delaunay; Elie Bou Nasr; Martine Delannes; Michel Soulie; Eric Huyghe
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Organ-preserving surgery for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Francisco E Martins; Raul N Rodrigues; Tomé M Lopes
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-04

Review 10.  Penile-sparing modalities in the management of low-stage penile cancer.

Authors:  Paurush Babbar; Nitin Yerram; Alice Crane; Daniel Sun; Kyle Ericson; Andrew Sun; Abhinav Khanna; Hadley Wood; Andrew Stephenson; Kenneth Angermeier
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.