Juanita Crook1, Clement Ma, Laval Grimard. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada. juanita.crook@rmp.uhn.on.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Squamous carcinoma of the penis is rare but psychologically devastating and potentially fatal. Radiotherapy offers a penile-conserving treatment option without jeopardizing cure. We have used primary penile brachytherapy as the treatment of choice for T1, T2 and selected T3 patients since 1989 and present updated results for 67 patients. METHODS: Mean age was 60 years (range 22-93). Stage was T1 in 56%, T2: 33%, T3: 8%, and Tx: 3%. Grade was moderate or poorly differentiated in 48%. In Toronto after-loading pulse dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (n = 41) was used for all treatments while Ottawa used manually loaded Iridium(192) (n = 26). Two or three parallel planes of needles (median 6) were inserted using pre-drilled lucite templates for guidance and fixation; 60 Gy was delivered over 4-5 days. RESULTS: Median follow-up is 4 years (range 0.2-16.2). At 10 years, actuarial overall survival is 59%, cause specific survival 83.6%. Nine men died of penile cancer and eight of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. Penectomy was required for eight local failures and two necroses, for an actuarial penile preservation rate at 5 years of 88% and 10 years of 67%. The soft tissue necrosis rate is 12% and the urethral stenosis rate 9%. Six of 11 regional failures were salvaged by lymph node dissection +/- external radiation. The other five all had concurrent distant failure and died of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2 and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Close follow-up is mandatory as local failures and many regional failures can be salvaged by surgery.
OBJECTIVES:Squamous carcinoma of the penis is rare but psychologically devastating and potentially fatal. Radiotherapy offers a penile-conserving treatment option without jeopardizing cure. We have used primary penile brachytherapy as the treatment of choice for T1, T2 and selected T3 patients since 1989 and present updated results for 67 patients. METHODS: Mean age was 60 years (range 22-93). Stage was T1 in 56%, T2: 33%, T3: 8%, and Tx: 3%. Grade was moderate or poorly differentiated in 48%. In Toronto after-loading pulse dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy (n = 41) was used for all treatments while Ottawa used manually loaded Iridium(192) (n = 26). Two or three parallel planes of needles (median 6) were inserted using pre-drilled lucite templates for guidance and fixation; 60 Gy was delivered over 4-5 days. RESULTS: Median follow-up is 4 years (range 0.2-16.2). At 10 years, actuarial overall survival is 59%, cause specific survival 83.6%. Nine men died of penile cancer and eight of other causes with no evidence of recurrence. Penectomy was required for eight local failures and two necroses, for an actuarial penile preservation rate at 5 years of 88% and 10 years of 67%. The soft tissue necrosis rate is 12% and the urethral stenosis rate 9%. Six of 11 regional failures were salvaged by lymph node dissection +/- external radiation. The other five all had concurrent distant failure and died of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy is an effective treatment for T1, T2 and selected T3 SCC of the penis. Close follow-up is mandatory as local failures and many regional failures can be salvaged by surgery.
Authors: Mahmut Ozsahin; Patrice Jichlinski; Damien C Weber; David Azria; Michel Zimmermann; Louis Guillou; Shelley Bulling; Raphael Moeckli; René O Mirimanoff; Abderrahim Zouhair Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J C Soria; K Fizazi; D Piron; A Kramar; A Gerbaulet; C Haie-Meder; J L Perrin; B Court; P Wibault; C Théodore Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: M McLean; A M Akl; P Warde; R Bissett; T Panzarella; M Gospodarowicz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Brian V Balgobind; Kees Koedooder; Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga; Raquel Dávila Fajardo; Coen R N Rasch; Bradley R Pieters Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Lance C Pagliaro; Dallas L Williams; Danai Daliani; Michael B Williams; William Osai; Michael Kincaid; Sijin Wen; Peter F Thall; Curtis A Pettaway Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Peter E Clark; Philippe E Spiess; Neeraj Agarwal; Matthew C Biagioli; Mario A Eisenberger; Richard E Greenberg; Harry W Herr; Brant A Inman; Deborah A Kuban; Timothy M Kuzel; Subodh M Lele; Jeff Michalski; Lance Pagliaro; Sumanta K Pal; Anthony Patterson; Elizabeth R Plimack; Kamal S Pohar; Michael P Porter; Jerome P Richie; Wade J Sexton; William U Shipley; Eric J Small; Donald L Trump; Geoffrey Wile; Timothy G Wilson; Mary Dwyer; Maria Ho Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 11.908