Literature DB >> 923835

Microscopic vasectomy reversal.

S J Silber.   

Abstract

More than 300 patients undergoing microscopic vasovasostomy have been carefully studied in an effort to determine the factors which affect the recovery of fertility after an accurate microscopic reanastomosis. The over-all pregnancy rate in an unselected group of early patients was 71%. Recovery of fertility correlated with the return of normal sperm counts and with the quality of seminal fluid in the vas deferens on the testicular side of the obstruction at the time of vasovasostomy. The three most important factors influencing return of fertility after vasovasostomy are (1) a meticulous microscopic technique for reconnection, (2) the duration of time the vas deferens has been obstructed, and (3) the presence of absence of a sperm granuloma at the site of the vasectomy, venting the long-term pressure buildup which otherwise would occur. The presence of a sperm granuloma at the vasectomy site generally ensured the presence of good quality sperm in the vas fluid at the time of vasovasostomy and the recovery of a good sperm count postoperatively. If all three of these factors are favorable, vasectomy should be reversible for most patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 923835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  21 in total

1.  Reversing vasectomy.

Authors:  A K Banerjee; A Simpson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-02

2.  A novel technique for vas deferens transection repairs.

Authors:  Ibrahim Onur Ozen; Baris Bagbanci; Arzu Demirtola; Ramazan Karabulut; Ozlem Ozen; Billur Demirogullari; Zafer Turkyilmaz; Kaan Sonmez; Abdullah Can Basaklar; Nuri Kale
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 3.  Advances in male reproductive surgery: robotic-assisted vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Saad Elzanaty; Gert Dohle
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2012-12-21

Review 4.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Testicular obstruction: clinicopathological studies.

Authors:  W F Hendry; D A Levison; M C Parkinson; J M Parslow; M G Royle
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Lindsey Herrel; Wayland Hsiao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  The history of microsurgery in urology.

Authors:  Alexander W Pastuszak; Evan P Wenker; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients.

Authors:  H Fuse; H Kimura; T Katayama
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.

Authors:  Stéphane Bolduc; Marc Anthony Fischer; Genevieve Deceuninck; Michel Thabet
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  Current status of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  J Ullrich Schwarzer; Heiko Steinfatt
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.