Literature DB >> 18542824

Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.

Stéphane Bolduc1, Marc Anthony Fischer, Genevieve Deceuninck, Michel Thabet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Advances in surgical techniques have improved the outcome of microsurgical vasovasostomy (VV). We performed a retrospective analysis of surgical procedures to determine outcomes and predictors of VV success, to develop Kaplan-Meier Curves for predicting VV outcomes and to evaluate the use of alpha-glucosidase (AG) to predict outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We undertook a retrospective analysis of 747 modified 1-layer microsurgical VV procedures performed between 1984 and 2000. Obstructive interval, partner status, social status preoperatively and method of vasal obstruction, vasal fluid quality and sperm granuloma intraoperatively were compared with outcome results. Parameters evaluated at follow-up included semen analysis, AG concentration in ejaculate fluid and pregnancy rates.
RESULTS: The overall patency rate was 86% and pregnancy rates were 33% and 53% at 1 and 2 years after primary VV, respectively. Preoperative factors associated with successful outcome and pregnancy included shorter obstructive interval and same female partner (p < 0.05). Intraoperative factors predicting success included the use of surgical clips instead of suture at vasectomy, the presence of a sperm granuloma, the presence and quality of vasal fluid, and the presence and quality of sperm in vasal fluid. Further, increased AG in the postoperative semen predicted improved patency and pregnancy outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the effectiveness of VV for vasectomized men who wish to father children. It also demonstrates that preoperative and intraoperative factors are predictive of the VV outcome. Postoperative AG is also a useful marker of patency and it appears to predict pregnancy outcome.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18542824      PMCID: PMC2422992          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  31 in total

1.  Antisperm antibodies and fertility after vasovasostomy: a follow-up study of 216 men.

Authors:  H Meinertz; L Linnet; P Fogh-Andersen; T Hjort
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?

Authors:  J F Donovan; M DiBaise; A E Sparks; J Kessler; J I Sandlow
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Microsurgical vasovasostomy: the microdot technique of precision suture placement.

Authors:  M Goldstein; P S Li; G J Matthews
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  P-Nitrophenol-alpha-D-glucopyranoside as substrate for measurement of maltase activity in human semen.

Authors:  P Chapdelaine; R R Tremblay; J Y Dubé
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Vas deferens reanastomosis without splints and without magnification.

Authors:  R G Middleton; D Henderson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Failed vasectomy reversal: is a further attempt using microsurgery worthwhile?

Authors:  M Fox
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Should vasectomy reversal be performed in men with older female partners?

Authors:  A J Deck; R E Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Quantitative pathologic changes in the human testis after vasectomy. A controlled study.

Authors:  J P Jarow; R E Budin; M Dym; B R Zirkin; S Noren; F F Marshall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Modified one-layer microsurgical vasovasostomy in vasectomized patients.

Authors:  H Fuse; H Kimura; T Katayama
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Sperm granuloma and reversibility of vasectomy.

Authors:  S J Silber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-09-17       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Marco Cosentino; Maria F Peraza; Alvaro Vives; Josvany Sanchez; Daniel Moreno; Judith Perona; Gerardo Ortiz; Maria Alcoba; Eduardo Ruiz; Joaquim Sarquella
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Association between the presence of sperm in the vasal fluid during vasectomy reversal and postoperative patency: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Scovell; Douglas A Mata; Ranjith Ramasamy; Lindsey A Herrel; Wayland Hsiao; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  [Ischemic testicular necrosis following vasectomy: rare and typical complications of an outpatient procedure].

Authors:  N Rolfes; G Lümmen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Predictors of success after bilateral epididymovasostomy performed during vasectomy reversal: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Sirpi Nackeeran; Udi Blankstein; Joshua T White; Ethan Grober; Sheldon H Marks; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Surgical treatment of male infertility in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection - new insights.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Ricardo Miyaoka; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  DNA methylation in spermatogenesis and male infertility.

Authors:  Xiangrong Cui; Xuan Jing; Xueqing Wu; Meiqin Yan; Qiang Li; Yan Shen; Zhenqiang Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Influence of reproductive tract obstruction on expression of epididymal proteins and their restoration after patency.

Authors:  Bing-Kun Li; Xiang Wang; Chun-Xiao Liu; Shao-Bo Zheng; Hu-Lin Li; Li-Ping Li; A-Bai Xu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Techniques for microsurgical reconstruction of obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Joel L Marmar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

Review 9.  Obstructive azoospermia: reconstructive techniques and results.

Authors:  Karen Baker; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Treatment of failed vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical two-layer anastomosis technique.

Authors:  Bingkun Li; Guoling Chen; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.