Literature DB >> 29423834

Factors predicting success after microsurgical vasovasostomy.

Marco Cosentino1, Maria F Peraza2, Alvaro Vives2, Josvany Sanchez2, Daniel Moreno2, Judith Perona3, Gerardo Ortiz4, Maria Alcoba5, Eduardo Ruiz2, Joaquim Sarquella2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify factors predicting success and analyze critically the status of microsurgical double-layer vasovasostomy using predictive models.
METHODS: A cohort of 263 patients treated at our institution for vasectomy reversal between 1986 and 2010 was included in our study, and the literature was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were previous bilateral vasectomy and presence of at least two postoperative semen analyses; patients reporting pregnancy without a postoperative semen analysis were excluded. A double-layer, microscope-assisted, tension-free anastomosis vasovasostomy was performed approximating mucosa to mucosa and muscle to muscle with a 10-0 non-absorbable suture. A multivariate logistic regression backward stepwise model was used to predict combined success, and a predictive model was calculated with remaining variables.
RESULTS: Mean age was of 41.6 years (SD 7.1); mean duration of obstruction 7.2 years (SD 6.7). On multivariate analysis, uni- or bilateral granuloma and Silber grade of I-III were variable identified predicting higher probability to success (OR 3.105; 95% CI 1.108-8.702; p = 0.031 and OR 4.795; 95% CI 2.117-10.860; p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, some factors predicting success after vasovasostomy surgery are known but others remain unknown; our predictive model may easily predict patency and success after this surgery and offers a concrete assistance in counseling patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microsurgery; Patency; Predictive factors; Vasectomy reversal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29423834     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-018-1810-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  26 in total

1.  Outcomes for vasectomy reversal performed after obstructive intervals of at least 10 years.

Authors:  Peter N Kolettis; Edmund S Sabanegh; Anna M D'amico; Lyndon Box; Michael Sebesta; John R Burns
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  'Dr Steinach coming to make old young!': sex glands, vasectomy and the quest for rejuvenation in the roaring twenties.

Authors:  Chandak Sengoopta
Journal:  Endeavour       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 3.  Demographics of vasectomy--USA and international.

Authors:  John M Pile; Mark A Barone
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  "Dr. Sharp with his little knife": therapeutic and punitive origins of eugenic vasectomy--Indiana, 1892-1921.

Authors:  A Gugliotta
Journal:  J Hist Med Allied Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.088

5.  Microscopic vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  S J Silber
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Robot-assisted microsurgery in male infertility and andrology.

Authors:  Ahmet Gudeloglu; Jamin V Brahmbhatt; Sijo J Parekattil
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Multi-institutional validation of vasectomy reversal predictor.

Authors:  Sijo J Parekattil; Wayne Kuang; Peter N Kolettis; Fabio F Pasqualotto; Patrick Teloken; Claudio Teloken; Ajay K Nangia; James A Daitch; Craig Niederberger; Anthony J Thomas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on outcome of vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  Stephen Boorjian; Michael Lipkin; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution.

Authors:  P R Reilly
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.875

10.  Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group.

Authors:  A M Belker; A J Thomas; E F Fuchs; J W Konnak; I D Sharlip
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of surgical volume and resident involvement on patency rates after vasectomy reversal-A 14-year experience in an open access system.

Authors:  Alexandria M Hertz; Andrew W Stamm; Mark I Anderson; Karen C Baker
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-04-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.