Literature DB >> 23399733

Current status of vasectomy reversal.

J Ullrich Schwarzer1, Heiko Steinfatt.   

Abstract

Vasectomy reversal is the most common microsurgical intervention for the treatment of male infertility. Originally introduced in 1977, microsurgical vasectomy reversal has become highly sophisticated and is a minimally invasive, highly efficient and cost-effective treatment option for men with a desire to have children after vasectomy. It can be an effective physiological method of restoring fertility in more than 90% of vasectomized men. Although assisted reproductive technology (ART) is an alternative to vasectomy reversal, it is normally associated with higher costs without offering higher cumulative chances of a pregnancy. Recovery of physiological male fertility can take up to 2 years after vasectomy reversal, especially if reversal is performed >10 years after vasectomy, owing to impaired epididymal function. Under these circumstances, ART can be used to bridge the time until recovery of natural fertility. Although the basic principles of microsurgical vasovasostomy have been established since the late 1970s, there have since been numerous technical innovations to improve the delicate operation and promising new technical modifications, particularly for vasoepididymostomy, have been described. Robotic vasectomy reversal is an emerging field in specialized urologic centers, but whether the high quality of conventional microsurgical vasectomy reversal can be matched by robotic platforms is yet to be seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23399733     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  84 in total

1.  Vasectomy reversal: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Robert E Brannigan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Is intracytoplasmic sperm injection overused?

Authors:  Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Christine M Mullin; Alexis Adler; Nicole Noyes; James A Grifo; Alan S Berkeley
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Innovative single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy.

Authors:  Mara A Monoski; Jonathan Schiff; Philip S Li; Peter T K Chan; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Triangulation end-to-side vasoepididymostomy.

Authors:  R E Berger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The post-vasectomy length of the testicular vasal remnant: a predictor of surgical outcome in microscopic vasectomy reversal.

Authors:  M A Witt; S Heron; L I Lipshultz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Secondary azoospermia after vasovasostomy.

Authors:  Peter N Kolettis; Peter Fretz; John R Burns; Anna M D'amico; Lyndon C Box; Jay I Sandlow
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Repeat vasectomy reversal after initial failure: overall results and predictors for success.

Authors:  J Hernandez; E S Sabanegh
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical three-layer technique: one surgeon's experience over 18 years with 1300 patients.

Authors:  J U Schwarzer
Journal:  Int J Androl       Date:  2012-04-20

9.  The influence of vasovasostomy on antisperm antibodies in rats.

Authors:  J C Herr; S S Howards; D R Spell; P O Carey; S J Kendrick; T N Gallien; H H Handley; C J Flickinger
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 10.  Effects of vasectomy on the epididymis.

Authors:  C J Flickinger; S S Howards; J C Herr
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 2.769

View more
  8 in total

1.  Vasectomy reversal utilizing fibrin glue.

Authors:  G Luke Machen; Ali M Mahmoud; Colin E Kleinguetl; Wencong Chen; Stephanie E Harris; Erin T Bird
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-03-20

Review 2.  Infertility, impotence, and emasculation--psychosocial contexts for abandoning reproduction.

Authors:  Erik Wibowo; Thomas W Johnson; Richard J Wassersug
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  Commentary on "validation of robot-assisted vasectomy reversal".

Authors:  Premsant Sangkum; Faysal A Yafi; Wayne Jg Hellstrom
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Vasectomy Reversal must be the first step for a man who had a vasectomy and wants a children from a new marriage? Opinion: No.

Authors:  Kelly A Chiles; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  The need for epididymovasostomy at vasectomy reversal plateaus in older vasectomies: a study of 1229 cases.

Authors:  P Mui; A Perkins; P J Burrows; S F Marks; P J Turek
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 6.  Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Ryan P Smith
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Treatment of failed vasectomy reversal using a microsurgical two-layer anastomosis technique.

Authors:  Bingkun Li; Guoling Chen; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2013-06

8.  RISUG® as a male contraceptive: journey from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Barkha Khilwani; Ayesha Badar; Abdul S Ansari; Nirmal K Lohiya
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2020-02-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.