Literature DB >> 9231932

Comparison of toremifene and tamoxifen in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized double-blind, the 'nordic' phase III study.

S Pyrhönen1, R Valavaara, H Modig, M Pawlicki, T Pienkowski, S Gundersen, J Bauer, G Westman, S Lundgren, G Blanco, O Mella, I Nilsson, T Hietanen, I Hindy, J Vuorinen, A Hajba.   

Abstract

The study was planned to compare, in a prospective double-blind randomized trial, the efficacy and safety of toremifene (TOR) and tamoxifen (TAM) in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have not had prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. Four hundred and fifteen post-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive or ER-unknown advanced breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive daily either 60 mg TOR or 40 mg TAM. The patients were stratified to measurable and non-measurable but evaluable groups. They were assessed for response to therapy, time to progression (TTP), time to treatment failure (TTF), response duration, overall survival and drug toxicity. Two hundred and fourteen patients were randomized into TOR and 201 into TAM treatment. The response rate (complete + partial) was 31.3% for TOR and 37.3% for TAM (P = 0.215). The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the 6% difference was -15.1% to 3.1%. The median TTP was 7.3 months for TOR and 10.2 months for TAM (P = 0.047). The 95% CI for the hazard ratio of 0.80 was 0.64-1.00. A percentage of the TOR patients (9.8%) and the TAM patients (18.9%) discontinued the treatment prematurely (P = 0.011) for various reasons. Consequently, the median TTF of 6.3 vs 8.5 months did not differ significantly (P = 0.271). The hazard ratio was 0.89 and the subsequent 95% CI 0.73-1.09. The median overall survival was 33.0 months for TOR and 38.7 months for TAM (P = 0.645). The hazard ratio was 0.94 with 95% CI of 0.73-1.22. The transient difference in TTP may be related to an imbalance in ER content of the tumours. When only patients with ER-positive tumours were considered (n = 238), no difference between two treatments was seen (P = 0.578). TAM was associated with an overall slightly higher frequency of adverse drug reactions than TOR (44.3 vs 39.3%) and a higher discontinuation rate due to these events (3.5% vs 0.9%). Treatment-emerged moderate dizziness (P = 0.026) and cataracts (P = 0.026) were more frequent among TAM than among TOR patients. In conclusion, TOR (60 mg day(-1)) and TAM (40 mg day(-1)) are equally effective and safe in the treatment of advanced post-menopausal ER-positive or ER-unknown breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9231932      PMCID: PMC2223944          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  36 in total

1.  A two-year dietary carcinogenicity study of the antiestrogen toremifene in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  S Karlsson; Y Hirsimäki; E Mäntylä; L Nieminen; L Kangas; P Hirsimäki; C J Perry; M Mulhern; P Millar; J Handa; G M Williams
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.356

2.  Genotoxicity of tamoxifen, tamoxifen epoxide and toremifene in human lymphoblastoid cells containing human cytochrome P450s.

Authors:  J A Styles; A Davies; C K Lim; F De Matteis; L A Stanley; I N White; Z X Yuan; L L Smith
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.944

3.  Major difference in the hepatocarcinogenicity and DNA adduct forming ability between toremifene and tamoxifen in female Crl:CD(BR) rats.

Authors:  G C Hard; M J Iatropoulos; K Jordan; L Radi; O P Kaltenberg; A R Imondi; G M Williams
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Descriptive clinicopathologic study of 17 patients with endometrial cancer during or after adjuvant tamoxifen in early breast cancer.

Authors:  T Fornander; A C Hellström; B Moberger
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Endometrial changes in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen.

Authors:  E Lahti; G Blanco; A Kauppila; M Apaja-Sarkkinen; P J Taskinen; T Laatikainen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Tamoxifen induces hepatocellular carcinoma in rat liver: a 1-year study with two antiestrogens.

Authors:  P Hirsimäki; Y Hirsimäki; L Nieminen; B J Payne
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Diethylstilbestrol liver carcinogenicity and modification of DNA in rats.

Authors:  G M Williams; M Iatropoulos; R Cheung; L Radi; C X Wang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  [Phase II study of NK 622 (toremifene citrate) in advanced breast cancer, a multicentral cooperative dose finding study].

Authors:  T Tominaga; O Abe; M Izuo; Y Nomura
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1993-01

9.  Endometrial cancer in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients: findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-14.

Authors:  B Fisher; J P Costantino; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; W M Cronin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-06       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Screening for ocular toxicity in asymptomatic patients treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  J S Heier; R A Dragoo; R W Enzenauer; W J Waterhouse
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Comparative tolerability of first-generation selective estrogen receptor modulators in breast cancer treatment and prevention.

Authors:  M G Curtis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Toremifene in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mika Vj Mustonen; Seppo Pyrhönen; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

4.  Toremifene and tamoxifen have similar efficacy in the treatment of patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Qian-Ling Ye; Zhi-Min Zhai
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Protective effects of estrogen in a rat model of age-related cataracts.

Authors:  R M Bigsby; H Cardenas; A Caperell-Grant; C J Grubbs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Antiestrogens--tamoxifen, SERMs and beyond.

Authors:  K Dhingra
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacology of selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Authors:  B Haynes; M Dowsett
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 8.  Estrogen receptor modulators and down regulators: optimal use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Christa K Baumann; Monica Castiglione-Gertsch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Efficacy and economics of hormonal therapies for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael S Simon; Dina Ibrahim; Lisa Newman; Miron Stano
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Estrogen protects against radiation-induced cataractogenesis.

Authors:  Joseph R Dynlacht; Shailaja Valluri; Jennifer Lopez; Falon Greer; Colleen Desrosiers; Andrea Caperell-Grant; Marc S Mendonca; Robert M Bigsby
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.