Literature DB >> 11735660

Comparative tolerability of first-generation selective estrogen receptor modulators in breast cancer treatment and prevention.

M G Curtis1.   

Abstract

In general, the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) currently indicated for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer, i.e. tamoxifen and toremifene, are fairly well tolerated. However, tamoxifen has been shown to induce hepatocellular carcinomas in rats, but not in humans, and can increase the risk of endometrial cancer in humans by two to three times. Other potentially serious adverse effects which have been associated with tamoxifen and toremifene therapy include vasomotor symptoms, an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events, and an increased incidence of cataracts and ocular toxicity, fatty liver, and nonmalignant hepatic and uterine changes. In addition, long term tamoxifen use almost always results in resistance to the drug and, indeed, has actually been shown to promote tumour proliferation in human breast cancer cells. Both tamoxifen and toremifene display drug interactions with a variety of drug classes. The adverse events associated with these compounds have raised significant concerns regarding their widespread use for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer. In addition, because of the weakness and scarcity of the data on toremifene, any conclusions about its tolerability remain tentative until outcomes of ongoing clinical trials in the adjuvant setting are known. A third SERM, raloxifene, is the focus of several large randomised trials examining its efficacy in the prevention of breast cancer. At present, each potential adverse event needs to be weighed against potential benefits in the decision to undergo SERM treatment. An array of therapies is currently available for patients with breast cancer and women at increased risk of disease; the risk-to-benefit ratio for each agent should be carefully examined in determining the most advantageous regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11735660     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200124140-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  128 in total

1.  Breast cancer prevention study aims to overcome drug bias.

Authors:  B Vastag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001 Jan 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Tamoxifen in postmenopausal women a safety perspective.

Authors:  E Robinson; G G Kimmick; H B Muss
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  Incidence of new primary cancers after adjuvant tamoxifen therapy and radiotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  M Andersson; H H Storm; H T Mouridsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Raloxifene.

Authors:  J A Balfour; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Should clinicians be concerned about the carcinogenic potential of tamoxifen?

Authors:  V C Jordan; M Morrow
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Toremifene. where do we stand?

Authors:  J Mäenpää; K Holli; T Pasanen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action.

Authors:  J I MacGregor; V C Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 8.  Alternate antiestrogens and approaches to the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  V C Jordan
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  1995

Review 9.  What do we know and what don't we know about tamoxifen in the human uterus.

Authors:  A Friedl; V C Jordan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Prevention of breast cancer with tamoxifen: preliminary findings from the Italian randomised trial among hysterectomised women. Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study.

Authors:  U Veronesi; P Maisonneuve; A Costa; V Sacchini; C Maltoni; C Robertson; N Rotmensz; P Boyle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  The haunting of medical journals: how ghostwriting sold "HRT".

Authors:  Adriane J Fugh-Berman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 2.  Advances in estrogen receptor biology: prospects for improvements in targeted breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Wenlin Shao; Myles Brown
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 6.466

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.