Literature DB >> 12149051

Efficacy and economics of hormonal therapies for advanced breast cancer.

Michael S Simon1, Dina Ibrahim, Lisa Newman, Miron Stano.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality among postmenopausal women in the US, and the economic burden of breast cancer care comprises a large percentage of the healthcare budget. Hormonal therapies have a proven place in the management of advanced breast cancer. This type of therapy is more likely to be used in older, compared with younger, women, because tumours in older women are more likely to express estrogen and progesterone receptors. While it is difficult to measure the costs of cancer care because of variation in extent and duration of treatment, treatment-related costs including costs of hormonal agents used for advanced disease account for a relatively small component of the overall costs. Newer hormonal regimens such as the new third generation nonsteroidal (letrozole, anastrozole) and steroidal (exemestane) aromatase inhibitors have shown improved clinical efficacy compared with standard regimens such as megestrol and tamoxifen in the metastatic setting in terms of objective responses or time to tumour progression. In addition the newer agents have improved toxicity profiles. Cost analyses of the newer aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole and letrozole), compared with megestrol, show an optimistic outlook for these agents. Additional work needs to be done looking at a comparison of the efficacy and costs of the aromatase inhibitors relative to the currently recommended hormonal treatments used for women with metastatic breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12149051     DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200219060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs Aging        ISSN: 1170-229X            Impact factor:   3.923


  81 in total

Review 1.  The economic potential of tamoxifen prophylaxis in breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Butler
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Racial differences in breast carcinoma survival.

Authors:  S A Joslyn; M M West
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Meta-analysis of trials comparing toremifene with tamoxifen and factors predicting outcome of antiestrogen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  S Pyrhönen; J Ellmén; J Vuorinen; M Gershanovich; T Tominaga; M Kaufmann; D F Hayes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Five-hundred life-saving interventions and their cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  T O Tengs; M E Adams; J S Pliskin; D G Safran; J E Siegel; M C Weinstein; J D Graham
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 5.  Should clinicians be concerned about the carcinogenic potential of tamoxifen?

Authors:  V C Jordan; M Morrow
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Exemestane improves survival compared with megoestrol acetate in postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer who have failed on tamoxifen. results Of a double-blind randomised phase III trial.

Authors:  M Kaufmann; E Bajetta; L Y Dirix; L E Fein; S E Jones; J Cervek; C Fowst; A Polli; E Di Salle; G Massimini; G Piscitelli
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Anastrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer in 668 postmenopausal women: results of the Tamoxifen or Arimidex Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability study.

Authors:  J Bonneterre; B Thürlimann; J F Robertson; M Krzakowski; L Mauriac; P Koralewski; I Vergote; A Webster; M Steinberg; M von Euler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A study of fadrozole, a new aromatase inhibitor, in postmenopausal women with advanced metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J I Raats; G Falkson; H C Falkson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Use of tamoxifen for breast cancer: twenty-eight years later.

Authors:  I A Jaiyesimi; A U Buzdar; D A Decker; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Targeting PP2A inhibits the growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mohammed Hafiz Uddin; Julio M Pimentel; Madhumita Chatterjee; Joshu E Allen; Zhengping Zhuang; Gen Sheng Wu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Letrozole: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Monique P Curran; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  ONC201 activates ER stress to inhibit the growth of triple-negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Xun Yuan; Dhonghyo Kho; Jing Xu; Ambikai Gajan; Kongming Wu; Gen Sheng Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-28

4.  Proteomic Analysis Identifies p62/SQSTM1 as a Critical Player in PARP Inhibitor Resistance.

Authors:  Mohammed Hafiz Uddin; Jun-Ying Zhou; Julio Pimentel; Steve M Patrick; Seongho Kim; Malathy P Shekhar; Gen Sheng Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.