Literature DB >> 14625906

The citizen's preferences for financing public health care: a Danish survey.

Dorte Gyrd-Hansen1, Ulla Slothuus.   

Abstract

The Danish public's willingness to forego private consumption in order to obtain improved health care services was investigated using conjoint analysis. The survey was undertaken in the year 1999. 1865 respondents participated in face-to-face interviews and were presented with pair wise choices of different future health care systems. Openness towards the introduction of user charges to a smaller degree demonstrated willingness to compromise relative equity in access to health care in order to avoid a tax increase. Willingness-to-pay for quality attributes lie in the range 780-2350 DKK ($89-$267) if paid by increasing maximum user charges, and in the 0-1220 DKK ($0-$139) bracket, when financed by increased income taxes.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 14625906     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015345429726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ        ISSN: 1389-6563


  1 in total

1.  Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management.

Authors:  M Ryan; J Hughes
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.046

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Discrete choice experiment of smoking cessation behaviour in Japan.

Authors:  Rei Goto; Shuzo Nishimura; Takanori Ida
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Paul Burton; Elizabeth Kendall; Julie Ratcliffe; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-06-16

Review 3.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 4.  The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Dan Rigby; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.