INTRODUCTION: According to national organisations, obstetric services should be able to initiate a caesarean delivery within 30 minutes of the decision to operate. This is uniquely challenging in a small, rural hospital. In 2001, the authors' hospital was unable to meet this guideline reliably. This project demonstrates how we improved our emergency caesarean delivery response time. METHODS: The caesarean delivery process was examined, project co-chairs were selected and key personnel were identified. Four working groups (doctors, nurses, anaesthesia, operating room personnel) were formed to analyse and improve component parts of the process. Over time, multiple small changes were made, initially by each working group and then by the entire caesarean delivery team. Decision-to-incision time was the main outcome measure. The authors also measured standard birth statistics and tracked the percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as an emergency. RESULTS: Forty emergency caesarean deliveries occurred during the study. The mean decision-to-incision time dropped from 31 to 20 minutes and the treatment to goal ratio increased from 0.5 to 1.0. The percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as emergencies dropped significantly. There has been no change in the overall caesarean delivery rate or other markers of obstetric quality. CONCLUSIONS: A small, rural community hospital with limited resources can consistently meet the 30 minute decision-to-incision guideline for emergency caesarean delivery.
INTRODUCTION: According to national organisations, obstetric services should be able to initiate a caesarean delivery within 30 minutes of the decision to operate. This is uniquely challenging in a small, rural hospital. In 2001, the authors' hospital was unable to meet this guideline reliably. This project demonstrates how we improved our emergency caesarean delivery response time. METHODS: The caesarean delivery process was examined, project co-chairs were selected and key personnel were identified. Four working groups (doctors, nurses, anaesthesia, operating room personnel) were formed to analyse and improve component parts of the process. Over time, multiple small changes were made, initially by each working group and then by the entire caesarean delivery team. Decision-to-incision time was the main outcome measure. The authors also measured standard birth statistics and tracked the percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as an emergency. RESULTS: Forty emergency caesarean deliveries occurred during the study. The mean decision-to-incision time dropped from 31 to 20 minutes and the treatment to goal ratio increased from 0.5 to 1.0. The percentage of caesarean deliveries that were classified as emergencies dropped significantly. There has been no change in the overall caesarean delivery rate or other markers of obstetric quality. CONCLUSIONS: A small, rural community hospital with limited resources can consistently meet the 30 minute decision-to-incision guideline for emergency caesarean delivery.
Authors: Suneet P Chauhan; Everett F Magann; John R Scott; James A Scardo; Nancy W Hendrix; James N Martin Journal: J Reprod Med Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 0.142
Authors: Fayez K Nasrallah; Hassan M Harirah; Rakesh Vadhera; Venu Jain; Letitia T Franklin; Gary D V Hankins Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Cynthia J Holcroft; Ernest M Graham; Abimbola Aina-Mumuney; Karishma K Rai; Janice L Henderson; Donald H Penning Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Steven L Bloom; Kenneth J Leveno; Catherine Y Spong; Sharon Gilbert; John C Hauth; Mark B Landon; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; Steven G Gabbe Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Mark E Splaine; Greg Ogrinc; Stuart C Gilman; David C Aron; Carlos A Estrada; Gary E Rosenthal; Sei Lee; Robert S Dittus; Paul B Batalden Journal: Acad Med Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Gary L Darmstadt; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Rachel A Haws; Esme V Menezes; Tanya Soomro; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: G Ogrinc; S E Mooney; C Estrada; T Foster; D Goldmann; L W Hall; M M Huizinga; S K Liu; P Mills; J Neily; W Nelson; P J Pronovost; L Provost; L V Rubenstein; T Speroff; M Splaine; R Thomson; A M Tomolo; B Watts Journal: Qual Saf Health Care Date: 2008-10