Literature DB >> 9215763

Developmental tasks of childhood and adolescence: implications for genetic testing.

J H Fanos1.   

Abstract

Many reports have recently recommended a careful weighing of the potential benefits and harms of genetic testing (carrier or predisposition) of children and adolescents [Andrews et al., Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994; Wertz et al., JAMA, 272:875-881, 1994; Clinical Genetics Society (UK), J Med Genet, 31:785-797, 1994; ASHJ/ACMG, Am J Hum Genet, 57:1233-1241, 1995]. Despite this, youngsters are currently being tested for late-onset disorders as well as for carrier status [Reilly and Wertz, Am J Hum Genet, 57:A57, 1995]. Many children to be tested will be those in at-risk families, who may already have experienced the chronic illness or death of a close relative. Thus, reactions to testing will be influenced by prior family experiences. Emotional reactions to testing will be determined by both the child's cognitive and psychosocial development. Testing of adolescents may alter the achievement of developmental tasks, including seeking freedom from parental figures, establishment of personal identity, handling of sexual energies, and remodeling of former idealizations of self and others. There are many potential dilemmas in deciding whether to test a child or adolescent for genetic status. If parents choose not to test, the risk is for later difficulty integrating such information into the self concept. If parents test and do not tell results, the risk is for creating a climate of family secrecy. If parents test and tell results, the risk is robbing the child of the autonomy of his or her own later decision. Perhaps the question of whether to test is not the real question. More than genetic testing, genetic counseling is of crucial importance in thoughtful decisions concerning whether to test an individual child or adolescent. A more important question may be how to provide unaffected children in at-risk families with appropriate counseling. Provision of psychosocial support to at-risk families will enable the child to encounter genetic testing, if necessary, supported with the best possible resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9215763     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970711)71:1<22::aid-ajmg4>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  29 in total

1.  Counseling adolescents and the challenges for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Alice Callard; Jessica Williams; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Potential Uses and Inherent Challenges of Using Genome-Scale Sequencing to Augment Current Newborn Screening.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Cynthia M Powell
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Disclosing Secondary Findings from Pediatric Sequencing to Families: Considering the "Benefit to Families".

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Predictive testing of eighteen year olds: counseling challenges.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Elly Lynch; Lesley Spencer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Parents' perceptions of functioning in families having a child with a genetic condition.

Authors:  Kathleen A Knafl; George J Knafl; Agatha M Gallo; Denise Angst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth Melvin; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  The Influence of Adolescence on Parents' Perspectives of Testing and Discussing Inherited Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Corinna L Schultz; Melissa A Alderfer; Robert B Lindell; Zachary McClain; Kristin Zelley; Kim E Nichols; Carol A Ford
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Experience with genetic counseling: the adolescent perspective.

Authors:  Amanda Pichini; Cheryl Shuman; Karen Sappleton; Miriam Kaufman; David Chitayat; Riyana Babul-Hirji
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.