Literature DB >> 9209882

Load-displacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data.

H J Wilke1, S T Krischak, K H Wenger, L E Claes.   

Abstract

The availability of human cadaveric spine specimens for in vitro tests is limited and the risk of infection is now of vital concern. As an alternative or supplement, calf spines have been used as models for human spines, in particular to evaluate spinal implants. However, neither qualitative nor quantitative biomechanical data on calf spines are available for comparison with data on human specimens. The purpose of this study was to determine the fundamental biomechanical properties of calf spines and to compare them with existing data from human specimens. Range of motion, neutral zone, and stiffness properties of thoracolumbar calf spines (T6-L6) were determined under pure moment loading in flexion and extension, axial left/right rotation and right/left lateral bending. Biomechanical similarities were observed between the calf and reported human data, most notably in axial rotation and lateral bending. Range of motion in the lumbar spine in flexion and extension was somewhat less in the calf than that typically reported for the human, though still within the range. These results suggest that the calf spine can be considered on a limited basis as a model for the human spine in certain in vitro tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9209882      PMCID: PMC3454592          DOI: 10.1007/bf01358746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  58 in total

1.  Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation. An in vitro biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  T Asazuma; I A Stokes; M S Moreland; N Suzuki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Biomechanical testing of three newly developed transpedicular multisegmental fixation systems.

Authors:  S Eggli; F Schläpfer; M Angst; P Witschger; M Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Application of a stereoradiographic method for the study of intervertebral motion.

Authors:  A Plamondon; M Gagnon; G Maurais
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: II. Stability provided by eight internal fixation devices.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; K Abumi; J Duranceau; J J Crisco
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Anterior spinal fixation after lumbar corpectomy. A study in dogs.

Authors:  T A Zdeblick; O Shirado; P C McAfee; H deGroot; K E Warden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  An anatomic basis for spinal instability: a porcine trauma model.

Authors:  T R Oxland; M M Panjabi; E P Southern; J S Duranceau
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of methods of posterior stabilization of the spine and posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis for lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis. A calf-spine model.

Authors:  O Shirado; T A Zdeblick; P C McAfee; K E Warden
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Laboratory testing of segmental spinal instrumentation versus traditional Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis treatment.

Authors:  D R Wenger; J J Carollo; J A Wilkerson; K Wauters; J A Herring
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Spinal instrumentation for metastatic disease: in vitro biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  J G Heller; T A Zdeblick; D A Kunz; R McCabe; M E Cooke
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1993-02

10.  A comparative biomechanical study of spinal fixation using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  J P Farcy; M Weidenbaum; C B Michelsen; D A Hoeltzel; K A Athanasiou
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  17 in total

1.  Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine.

Authors:  Ti-Sheng Chang; Jia-Hao Chang; Chien-Shiung Wang; Hung-Yi Chen; Ching-Wei Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Is a collagen scaffold for a tissue engineered nucleus replacement capable of restoring disc height and stability in an animal model?

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Frank Heuer; Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke; Lutz Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Important macroscopic and microscopic differences in the bony and cartilaginous regions adjacent to the lumbar intervertebral disc between animal and man: a caveat to overinterpretation of animal experiments: comment to the article: Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal (C.H. Flamme et al.).

Authors:  M Pfeiffer; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies.

Authors:  Konrad Seller; Dieter Wahl; Alexander Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Erich Schneider; Berend Linke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbar muscle atrophy caused by harness replacement in a chronic calf model of total artificial heart implantation.

Authors:  Jamshid H Karimov; Kimberly A Such; Raymond Dessoffy; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 1.731

7.  Mature runt cow lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics.

Authors:  Glenn Robin Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Louis C Saeger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests?

Authors:  A Kettler; L Liakos; B Haegele; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel posterior integrated clamp that attaches to an existing posterior instrumentation for use in thoracolumbar revision.

Authors:  Patrick Senatus; Suresh Reddy Chinthakunta; Pedram Vazifeh; Saif Khalil
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2013-03-06

Review 10.  Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?

Authors:  Mauro Alini; Stephen M Eisenstein; Keita Ito; Christopher Little; A Annette Kettler; Koichi Masuda; James Melrose; Jim Ralphs; Ian Stokes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.