Literature DB >> 9196737

Convergence and divergence exhibit different response characteristics to symmetric stimuli.

G K Hung1, H Zhu, K J Ciuffreda.   

Abstract

The dynamic characteristics of horizontal convergence and divergence eye movement responses to symmetric stimuli were examined. Binocular eye movements were recorded in five, visually normal adult subjects using the infrared reflection technique for symmetric convergent and divergent blur-free, disparity-only, step stimuli of 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 deg. The main sequence as well as other temporal parameters including latency, time-to-peak velocity, time constant, and total duration were analyzed. A number of fundamental differences in the response characteristics were found between convergence and divergence. First, the slope of the peak velocity vs amplitude curve was approximately twice as high for convergence than divergence. The results are consistent with neurophysiological findings in monkeys and most findings in humans. Second, the initial fast component for convergence exhibited a larger amplitude than for divergence. This may reflect differences in central neural gain for convergence and divergence. And, third, all temporally related components were shorter for convergence than divergence. These findings provide an overall framework for vergence control and suggest fundamental differences in neural processing delays and neural controller pathways for convergence and divergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196737     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00271-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Short-term saccadic adaptation in the macaque monkey: a binocular mechanism.

Authors:  K P Schultz; C Busettini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Comparison of symmetrical prism adaptation to asymmetrical prism adaptation in those with normal binocular vision.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Chang Yaramothu; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Adduction-Abduction Asymmetry in Saccades During Video-Oculographic Monocular Recording: A Word of Caution.

Authors:  Koji Takahashi; Osamu Tanaka; Yosuke Kudo; Eriko Sugawara; Ken Johkura
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2019-04-04

5.  Functional anatomy of extraocular muscles during human vergence compensation of horizontal heterophoria.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Sustained fixation induced changes in phoria and convergence peak velocity.

Authors:  Eun H Kim; Vincent R Vicci; Sang J Han; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The engagement of cortical areas preceding exogenous vergence eye movements.

Authors:  Monika Wojtczak-Kwaśniewska; Anna Przekoracka-Krawczyk; Rob H J Van der Lubbe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The relationship between reflex eye realignment and the percept of single vision in young children.

Authors:  Kimberly Meier; Deanna L Lundell; Eric S Seemiller; Deborah Giaschi; Laurie M Wilcox; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reflexive Fusional Vergence and Its Plasticity Are Impaired in Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Ian M Erkelens; William R Bobier
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.