Literature DB >> 20561972

The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

James Maxwell1, Jianliang Tong, Clifton M Schor.   

Abstract

Main sequences, the function describing the relationship between eye movement amplitude and velocity, have been used extensively in oculomotor research as an indicator of first-order dynamics yet it is difficult to find main sequence analyses for accommodative vergence or for disparity vergence in isolation when all mitigating factors have been well controlled and there are no studies in which accommodative vergence and disparity vergence main sequences have been generated for the same group of subjects. The present study measured main sequences in: (1) accommodative vergence with disparity vergence open loop, (2) disparity vergence with accommodation open loop, and (3) combinations of accommodative and disparity vergence. A dynamic AC/A ratio was defined and was found to be similar to the traditional static AC/A ratio. Vergence acceleration was measured for all conditions. A pulse-step model of accommodation and convergence was constructed to interpret the dynamics of the crosslinked interactions between the two systems. The model supports cross-coupling of both the pulse and step components and simulates the primary empirical findings that: (1) disparity vergence has a higher main sequence slope than accommodative vergence, (2) both accommodative and disparity vergence acceleration increase with response amplitude whereas accommodation acceleration does not. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20561972      PMCID: PMC2967359          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  35 in total

1.  Saccades reduce latency and increase velocity of ocular accommodation.

Authors:  C M Schor; L A Lott; D Pope; A D Graham
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Cross-coupling between accommodation and convergence is optimized for a broad range of directions and distances of gaze.

Authors:  Dorothy Nguyen; Indu Vedamurthy; Clifton Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Dynamic accommodative vergence components in binocular vision.

Authors:  J Semmlow; N Venkiteswaran
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neurons in the monkey midbrain with activity related to vergence eye movement and accommodation.

Authors:  S J Judge; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Disparity-induced and blur-induced convergence eye movement and accommodation in the monkey.

Authors:  B G Cumming; S J Judge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A centre for accommodative vergence motor control.

Authors:  D Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Identification of accommodative vergence contribution to the near response using response variance.

Authors:  G K Hung; J L Semmlow; K J Ciuffreda
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence.

Authors:  J Semmlow; P Wetzel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1979-05

9.  Accommodative and fusional components of fixation disparity.

Authors:  J L Semmlow; G Hung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Binocular eye movements during accommodative vergence.

Authors:  R V Kenyon; K J Ciuffreda; L Stark
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  9 in total

1.  The influence of age on adaptation of disparity vergence and phoria.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Chang Yaramothu; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Short-term adaptation of accommodation, accommodative vergence and disparity vergence facility.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Binocular retinal image differences influence eye-position signals for perceived visual direction.

Authors:  Deepika Sridhar; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Influence of virtual reality on visual parameters: immersive versus non-immersive mode.

Authors:  Hyeon Jeong Yoon; Jonghwa Kim; Sang Woo Park; Hwan Heo
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Dynamics of the Disparity Vergence Fusion Sustain Component.

Authors:  John L Semmlow; Chang Yaramothu; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 0.957

6.  Is Primate Lens Accommodation Unilaterally or Bilaterally Controlled?

Authors:  Paul J May; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  A covered eye fails to follow an object moving in depth.

Authors:  Arvind Chandna; Jeremy Badler; Devashish Singh; Scott Watamaniuk; Stephen Heinen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Adaptation to Progressive Additive Lenses: Potential Factors to Consider.

Authors:  Tara L Alvarez; Eun H Kim; Bérangère Granger-Donetti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reflexive Fusional Vergence and Its Plasticity Are Impaired in Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Ian M Erkelens; William R Bobier
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.