Literature DB >> 33431972

The relationship between reflex eye realignment and the percept of single vision in young children.

Kimberly Meier1,2, Deanna L Lundell3, Eric S Seemiller3, Deborah Giaschi4, Laurie M Wilcox5, T Rowan Candy3,6.   

Abstract

Effective binocular vision is dependent on both motor and perceptual function. Young children undergo development of both components while interacting with their dynamic three-dimensional environment. When this development fails, eye misalignment and double vision may result. We compared the range of image disparities over which young children display reflex motor realignment of their eyes with the range over which they report a single versus double percept. In response to step changes in the disparity of a 2.2° wide stimulus, 5-year-olds generated an adult-like reflex vergence velocity tuning function peaking at 2° of disparity, with a mean latency of 210 ms. On average, they reported double vision for stimulus disparities of 3° and larger, compared to 1° in adult reports. Three-year-olds also generated reflex vergence tuning functions peaking at approximately 2° of disparity, but their percepts could not be assessed. These data suggest that, by age 5, reflex eye realignment responses and percepts driven by these brief stimuli are tightly coordinated in space and time to permit robust binocular function around the point of fixation. Importantly, the plastic neural processes maintaining this tight coordination during growth control the stability of visual information driving learning during childhood.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33431972      PMCID: PMC7801643          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78636-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  51 in total

1.  Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision.

Authors:  M S Banks; R N Aslin; R D Letson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Control of vergence: gating among disparity inputs by voluntary target selection.

Authors:  C J Erkelens; H Collewijn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Spatial frequency selectivity of visual suppression during convergence eye movements.

Authors:  Sven Mucke; Niall C Strang; Senay Aydin; Edward A H Mallen; Dirk Seidel; Velitchko Manahilov
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Vertical motor fusion.

Authors:  W A Houtman; J H Roze; W Scheper
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-09-30       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis.

Authors:  D E Mitchell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Vergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions.

Authors:  G K Hung; K J Ciuffreda; J L Semmlow; J L Horng
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Development of Relative Disparity Sensitivity in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; Holly E Gerhard; Wesley J Meredith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Binocular vision in infancy: Responsiveness to uncrossed horizontal disparity.

Authors:  Michael Kavšek; Stephanie K Braun
Journal:  Infant Behav Dev       Date:  2016-07-22

9.  Development of binocular fixation in human infants.

Authors:  R N Aslin
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1977-02

10.  Sensitivity of vergence responses of 5- to 10-week-old human infants.

Authors:  Eric S Seemiller; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.