Literature DB >> 9196650

The effect on compliance of a health education leaflet in colorectal cancer screening in general practice in central England.

A R Hart1, T L Barone, S P Gay, A Inglis, L Griffin, C A Tallon, J F Mayberry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To raise compliance in a general practice based colorectal cancer screening programme by the use of a simple health educational leaflet.
DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of the leaflet's effect on completion of faecal occult blood tests. The leaflet explained the high frequency of colorectal cancer, the principles of screening, and addressed reasons for non-compliance.
SETTING: The British town of Market Harborough where most of the population are registered with a single practice. PARTICIPANTS: These comprised 1571 residents aged 61 to 70 years registered with the practice. Residents were invited to receive a free faecal occult blood test in a colorectal cancer screening programme. Half the population were randomly assigned to receive the educational leaflet about screening.
RESULTS: Compliance in test and control groups, positive rate of stool testing, and pathology detected were measured. Compliance was higher in men who received the leaflet in those aged 61 to 65 years (36% v 27%, chi2 = 4.0, p < 0.05) and in men aged 66 to 70 years (39% v 23%, chi2 = 9.7, p < 0.01). In women, use of the leaflet did not affect compliance in those aged either 61 to 65 years (38% v 36%, chi2 = 0.1, NS) or 66 to 70 years (31% v 31%, chi2 = 0.0, NS). The positive rate of stool testing in patients observing the required dietary restrictions was 1.6%. A significant lesion was detected in 1.4% of people tested (2 carcinomas and 5 patients with adenomatous polyps).
CONCLUSIONS: Health education leaflets addressing reasons for non-compliance significantly increased compliance in men and should be used in screening programmes. Reasons for the lack of success of the leaflet in women should be investigated and other interventions for raising compliance should be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196650      PMCID: PMC1060443          DOI: 10.1136/jech.51.2.187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  A new readability yardstick.

Authors:  R FLESCH
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1948-06

2.  Randomised trial of compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S Nichols; E Koch; R C Lallemand; R J Heald; L Izzard; D Machin; M A Mullee
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-07-12

3.  A comparison of methods for increasing compliance within a general practitioner based screening project for colorectal cancer and the effect on practitioner workload.

Authors:  G Pye; M Christie; J O Chamberlain; S M Moss; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Computer-managed cervical cytology screening: a pilot study of non-attenders.

Authors:  A K Elkind; D Haran; A Eardley; B Spencer
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  The Frome experiment--value of screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P A Farrands; R L Griffiths; D C Britton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-06-06       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Role of dietary restriction in Haemoccult screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W M Thomas; G Pye; J D Hardcastle; J Chamberlain; R M Charnley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Screening for colorectal cancer: reasons for refusal of faecal occult blood testing in a general practice in England.

Authors:  K A Hynam; A R Hart; S P Gay; A Inglis; A C Wicks; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Acceptability of opportunistic screening for occult gastrointestinal blood loss.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; R C Cherry; J W Fielding; L Pike; R Holder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22

9.  Women who decline breast screening.

Authors:  U Maclean; D Sinfield; S Klein; B Harnden
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in the general population. Results of a controlled trial.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage; J Chamberlain; S S Amar; P D James; T W Balfour
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

2.  On attitudes about colorectal cancer screening among gastrointestinal specialists and general practitioners in the Netherlands.

Authors:  J S Terhaar Sive Droste; G D N Heine; M E Craanen; H Boot; C J J Mulder
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Colorectal cancer prevention. An approach to increasing compliance in a faecal occult blood test screening programme.

Authors:  A R Hart; J Eaden; S Barnett; A M de Bono; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Rural Population: Who Returns Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Kits?

Authors:  Richard A Crosby; Lindsay Stradtman; Tom Collins; Robin Vanderpool
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Evaluating the effectiveness of GP endorsement on increasing participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme in England: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sarah Damery; Steve Smith; Alison Clements; Roger Holder; Linda Nichols; Heather Draper; Sue Clifford; Laura Parker; Richard Hobbs; Sue Wilson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Factors influencing colorectal cancer screening participation.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno García
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 8.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Public awareness of colorectal cancer screening: knowledge, attitudes, and interventions for increasing screening uptake.

Authors:  Antonio Z Gimeno Garcia; Noemi Hernandez Alvarez Buylla; David Nicolas-Perez; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-03-05

10.  Management of Gastrointestinal Disorders in Central and Eastern Europe: Self-Reported Practice of Primary Care Physicians.

Authors:  Małgorzata Palka; Anna Krztoń-Królewiecka; Tomasz Tomasik; Bohumil Seifert; Ewa Wójtowicz; Adam Windak
Journal:  Zdr Varst       Date:  2014-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.