Literature DB >> 3418289

A comparison of methods for increasing compliance within a general practitioner based screening project for colorectal cancer and the effect on practitioner workload.

G Pye1, M Christie, J O Chamberlain, S M Moss, J D Hardcastle.   

Abstract

Screening for colorectal cancer by testing for faecal occult blood (FOBT) is effective for early diagnosis, but the success of a screening programme also depends on compliance. The aims of this study were to assess the effect of health education on compliance and to assess any addition to general practitioner workload that resulted. Altogether 3860 patients were recruited and randomly allocated to test or control group. The test group was further divided into subgroups, some of which received health education. Compliance with FOBT was 54.7% (210/384) in the subgroup receiving only the doctor's letter, which fell to 48.1% (743/1544) in the group receiving health education. General practitioner consultation rates were similar in test and control groups.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3418289      PMCID： PMC1052683          DOI： 10.1136/jech.42.1.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN： 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  16 in total

1.  President's address. The polyp-cancer sequence in the large bowel.

Authors:  B Morson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1974-06

2.  Fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer in a Veterans Administration Hospital.

Authors:  S J Sontag; C Durczak; G V Aranha; G Chejfec; W Frederick; H B Greenlee
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  The survival of patients with colorectal cancer treated in a regional hospital.

Authors:  P G Gill; P J Morris
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients using flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  D C Wherry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Screening for asymptomatic bowel cancer in general practice.

Authors:  R C Lallemand; P A Vakil; P Pearson; V Box
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-01-07

6.  Self-reported dark red bleeding as a marker comparable with occult blood testing in screening for large bowel neoplasms.

Authors:  A J Silman; P Mitchell; R J Nicholls; F A Macrae; R J Leicester; C I Bartram; M J Simmons; P D Campbell; C E Hearn; P J Constable
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Controlled trial of faecal occult blood testing in the detection of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; P A Farrands; T W Balfour; J Chamberlain; S S Amar; M G Sheldon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Delay in diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H W Holliday; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-02-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Progress report on controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  S J Winawer; M Andrews; B Flehinger; P Sherlock; D Schottenfeld; D G Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The prevention of invasive cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  V A Gilbertsen; J M Nelms
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860
View more
  14 in total

1.  Telephone outreach to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban minority population.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Brouse; Celia Shmukler; Alfred Neugut; Lawrence T DeCarlo; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The effect on compliance of a health education leaflet in colorectal cancer screening in general practice in central England.

Authors:  A R Hart; T L Barone; S P Gay; A Inglis; L Griffin; C A Tallon; J F Mayberry
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention.

Authors:  Judith M E Walsh; Rene Salazar; Tung T Nguyen; Celia Kaplan; Lam Kieu Nguyen; Jimmy Hwang; Stephen J McPhee; Rena J Pasick
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Mailed fecal-immunochemical test for colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Barcey T Levy; Mary L Merchant; Jason Wilbur
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-06

Review 5.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

6.  Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-05

7.  Effects of facilitated team meetings and learning collaboratives on colorectal cancer screening rates in primary care practices: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Eric K Shaw; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Alicja Piasecki; Shawna V Hudson; Jeanne M Ferrante; Reuben R McDaniel; Paul A Nutting; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic populations.

Authors:  A R Hart; A C Wicks; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 9.  Screening for colorectal cancer: a critical review.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; G Pye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Improving uptake of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a randomized trial of nonparticipant reminders in the English Screening Programme.

Authors:  Robert S Kerrison; Lesley M McGregor; Sarah Marshall; John Isitt; Nicholas Counsell; Colin J Rees; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 10.093
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.