BACKGROUND: OCT can image plaque microstructure at a level of resolution not previously demonstrated with other imaging techniques because it uses infrared light rather than acoustic waves. OBJECTIVES: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of in vitro atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: Segments of abdominal aorta were obtained immediately before postmortem examination. Images of 20 sites from five patients were acquired with OCT (operating at an optical wavelength of 1300 nm which was delivered to the sample through an optical fibre) and a 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer. After imaging, the microstructure of the tissue was assessed by routine histological processing. RESULTS: OCT yielded superior structural information in all plaques examined. The mean (SEM) axial resolution of OCT and IVUS imaging was 16 (1) and 110 (7), respectively, as determined by the point spread function from a mirror. Furthermore, the dynamic range of OCT was 109 dB compared with 43 dB for IVUS imaging. CONCLUSIONS: OCT represents a promising new technology for intracoronary imaging because of its high resolution, broad dynamic range, and ability to be delivered through intravascular catheters.
BACKGROUND: OCT can image plaque microstructure at a level of resolution not previously demonstrated with other imaging techniques because it uses infrared light rather than acoustic waves. OBJECTIVES: To compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging of in vitro atherosclerotic plaques. METHODS: Segments of abdominal aorta were obtained immediately before postmortem examination. Images of 20 sites from five patients were acquired with OCT (operating at an optical wavelength of 1300 nm which was delivered to the sample through an optical fibre) and a 30 MHz ultrasonic transducer. After imaging, the microstructure of the tissue was assessed by routine histological processing. RESULTS: OCT yielded superior structural information in all plaques examined. The mean (SEM) axial resolution of OCT and IVUS imaging was 16 (1) and 110 (7), respectively, as determined by the point spread function from a mirror. Furthermore, the dynamic range of OCT was 109 dB compared with 43 dB for IVUS imaging. CONCLUSIONS: OCT represents a promising new technology for intracoronary imaging because of its high resolution, broad dynamic range, and ability to be delivered through intravascular catheters.
Authors: M E Brezinski; G J Tearney; B E Bouma; J A Izatt; M R Hee; E A Swanson; J F Southern; J G Fujimoto Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J A Ambrose; M A Tannenbaum; D Alexopoulos; C E Hjemdahl-Monsen; J Leavy; M Weiss; S Borrico; R Gorlin; V Fuster Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1988-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M E Brezinski; G J Tearney; B E Bouma; S A Boppart; M R Hee; E A Swanson; J F Southern; J G Fujimoto Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1996-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: C A Puliafito; M R Hee; C P Lin; E Reichel; J S Schuman; J S Duker; J A Izatt; E A Swanson; J G Fujimoto Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 1995-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: G Finet; E Maurincomme; A Tabib; R J Crowley; I Magnin; R Roriz; J Beaune; M Amiel Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 1993 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: R J Peters; W E Kok; M G Havenith; H Rijsterborgh; A C van der Wal; C A Visser Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 1994 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Nirlep A Patel; Xingde Li; Debra L Stamper; James G Fujimoto; Mark E Brezinski Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse; Oliver A Meissner; Gregor Babaryka; Margit Bauer; Roger Eibel; Christian G Stief; Maximilian F Reiser; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-03-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andor W J M Glaudemans; Riemer H J A Slart; Alessandro Bozzao; Elena Bonanno; Marcello Arca; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Alberto Signore Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-03-20 Impact factor: 9.236