Literature DB >> 12198780

The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations.

T A Visser1, S M Zuvic, W F Bischof, V Di Lollo.   

Abstract

When two targets (T1 and T2) are displayed in rapid succession, accuracy of T2 identification varies as a function of the temporal lag between the targets (attentional blink, AB). In some studies, performance has been found to be most impaired at Lag 1--namely, when T2 followed T1 directly. In other studies, T2 performance at Lag 1 has been virtually unimpaired (Lag 1 sparing). In the present work, we examined how Lag 1 sparing is affected by attentional switches between targets displayed in the same location or in different locations. We found that Lag 1 sparing does not occur when a spatial shift is required between T1 and T2. This suggests that attention cannot be switched to a new location while the system is busy processing another stimulus. The results are explained by a modified version of an attentional gating model (Chun & Potter, 1995; Shapiro & Raymond, 1994).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12198780     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  12 in total

1.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? .

Authors:  J E Raymond; K L Shapiro; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?

Authors:  C M Moore; H Egeth; L R Berglan; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-09

3.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

4.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.

Authors:  M C Potter; M M Chun; B S Banks; M Muckenhoupt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.

Authors:  R Ward; J Duncan; K Shapiro
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-05

7.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.

Authors:  J Duncan; R Ward; K Shapiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Eyeblinks and visual suppression.

Authors:  F C Volkmann; L A Riggs; R K Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Structure of the visual array and saccadic latency: implications for oculomotor control.

Authors:  S Heywood; J Churcher
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.143

View more
  13 in total

1.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stefan van der Stigchel; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

2.  Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: evidence from the attentional blink.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Yuki Yamada
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-08

3.  When similarity leads to sparing: probing mechanisms underlying the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Corinne Davis; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-08-12

4.  Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.

Authors:  Jeffrey MacLeod; Brandie M Stewart; Aaron J Newman; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Attentional switches and dual-task interference.

Authors:  Janne F Ettwig; Adelbert W Bronkhorst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The attentional blink reveals the probabilistic nature of discrete conscious perception.

Authors:  Christopher L Asplund; Daryl Fougnie; Samir Zughni; Justin W Martin; René Marois
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-16

7.  The brain's router: a cortical network model of serial processing in the primate brain.

Authors:  Ariel Zylberberg; Diego Fernández Slezak; Pieter R Roelfsema; Stanislas Dehaene; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Target cueing provides support for target- and resource-based models of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Hannah L Pincham; Dénes Szűcs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Erroneous selection of a non-target item improves subsequent target identification in rapid serial visual presentations.

Authors:  Yuki Yamada; Atsunori Ariga; Kayo Miura; Takahiro Kawabe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-02-28

10.  No evidence for early modulation of evoked responses in primary visual cortex to irrelevant probe stimuli presented during the attentional blink.

Authors:  Oscar Jacoby; Troy A W Visser; Bianca C Hart; Ross Cunnington; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.