Literature DB >> 12199316

Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities.

P Jolicoeur1.   

Abstract

The purpose of the experiments was to demonstrate an attentional-blink (AB) effect in a visual second task following the processing of a simple auditory signal. Subjects monitored a stream of letters presented at the middle of a computer screen using rapid serial visual presentation for the presence of a visual target (an X or a Y). In experimental trials, the visual target followed a pure tone that required an immediate speeded-choice response. When the tone had to be processed, accuracy in the visual-encoding task suffered a marked and prolonged deficit that was timelocked to the onset of the tone. When the tone could be ignored or when no tone was presented, no deficit was observed in the visual task. The results demonstrate a cross-modal AB effect produced by a simple two-choice auditory discrimination task. The results are consistent with the view that at least part of the AB effect has a central, amodal, postperceptual locus.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12199316     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  11 in total

1.  Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded task1 decisions.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

2.  Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.

Authors:  M C Potter; M M Chun; B S Banks; M Muckenhoupt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The demonstration of short-term consolidation.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; R Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; J E Raymond; K M Arnell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.

Authors:  J Duncan; R Ward; K Shapiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Preparatory strategies in overlapping-task performance.

Authors:  R De Jong; J B Sweet
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-02

Review 9.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory.

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  37 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Selective influence of second target exposure duration and task-1 load effects in the attentional blink phenomenon.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; R Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-09

3.  The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.

Authors:  A T Hsiao; A S Reber
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

4.  A crossmodal attentional blink between vision and touch.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence; Katherine Fairbank; Alan Kingstone; Anne P Hillstrom; Kimron Shapiro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

5.  Cross-modality attentional blinks without preparatory task-set switching.

Authors:  Karen M Arnell; Julie M Larson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

6.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Principles of cross-modal competition: evidence from deficits of attention.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Sharma K Hendel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

8.  A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects.

Authors:  Sandhiran Patchay; Umberto Castiello; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

9.  Dual-tasking alleviated sleep deprivation disruption in visuomotor tracking: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yunglin Gazes; Brian C Rakitin; Jason Steffener; Christian Habeck; Sarah H Lisanby; Brady Butterfield; Robert C Basner; Claude Ghez; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  When do visual and verbal memories conflict? The importance of working-memory load and retrieval.

Authors:  Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.