Literature DB >> 9193174

Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

K D Lillemoe1, S A Martin, J L Cameron, C J Yeo, M A Talamini, S Kaushal, J Coleman, A C Venbrux, S J Savader, F A Osterman, H A Pitt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors provide the results of follow-up evaluation after combined surgical and radiologic management of 89 patients with major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence and mechanism of injury of major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been clearly defined. Furthermore, a number of series have described the management of these injuries by surgical, endoscopic, and radiologic techniques with excellent short-term results. Long-term follow-up data, however, are lacking in the management of these injuries.
METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on 89 patients treated at a single institution with major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy managed between July 1, 1990, and July 1, 1996. Patients referred with injuries underwent early percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage. Based on the cholangiographic appearance and clinical situation, patients were managed by either percutaneous balloon dilatation or surgical reconstruction with a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with transanastomotic stenting. Follow-up was obtained by personal interview during October 1996.
RESULTS: Two patients died without an attempt at definitive therapy. Both deaths were caused by sepsis and multisystem organ failure present at the time of transfer to the authors' institution. The remaining 87 patients were managed initially by either balloon dilatation (N = 28) or surgical reconstruction (N = 59). Ten patients have not completed treatment and still have biliary stents in place. Evaluation of 25 patients completing treatment after balloon dilatation (mean follow-up, 27.8 months) showed a success rate of 64%. Evaluation of 52 patients completing treatment after surgical reconstruction (mean follow-up, 33.4 months) showed a success rate of 92%. All failures were managed successfully by either surgical reconstruction or balloon dilatation.
CONCLUSIONS: Major bile duct injuries can be managed successfully by combined surgical and radiologic techniques. This series provides, for the first time, significant follow-up on a large number of patients with overall success rates of 64% after balloon dilatation and 92% after surgical reconstruction. The combination of surgery and balloon dilatation resulted in a successful outcome in 100% of patients treated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193174      PMCID: PMC1190777          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199705000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  42 in total

1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A statewide experience. The Connecticut Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Registry.

Authors:  R Orlando; J C Russell; J Lynch; A Mattie
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

2.  Complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H R Bernard; T W Hartman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Management of bile leaks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D C Brooks; J M Becker; P J Connors; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Management of major biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Branum; C Schmitt; J Baillie; P Suhocki; M Baker; A Davidoff; S Branch; R Chari; G Cucchiaro; E Murray
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: coordinated radiologic and surgical management in 21 patients.

Authors:  E vanSonnenberg; H B D'Agostino; D W Easter; R B Sanchez; R A Christensen; R K Kerlan; A R Moossa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Benign biliary strictures. Surgery or endoscopy?

Authors:  P H Davids; A K Tanka; E A Rauws; T M van Gulik; D J van Leeuwen; L T de Wit; P C Verbeek; K Huibregtse; M N van der Heyde; G N Tytgat
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients.

Authors:  J J Roslyn; G S Binns; E F Hughes; K Saunders-Kirkwood; M J Zinner; J A Cates
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Diagnosis and management of biliary complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; M W Flye; L M Brunt; P T Stockmann; G A Sicard; D Picus; S A Edmundowicz; G Aliperti
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  The early experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Oregon.

Authors:  K E Deveney
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-06

10.  Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Ress; M G Sarr; D M Nagorney; M B Farnell; J H Donohue; D C McIlrath
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  43 in total

1.  Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Néstor A Gómez; Ludwig R Alvarez; Alfredo Mite; Jean P Andrade; José R Alvarez; Paola E Vargas; Nancy E Tomalá; Alex F Vivas; Jorge A Zapatier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Results of a new strategy for reconstruction of biliary injuries having an isolated right-sided component.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; D D Picus; J A Drebin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  S A Ahrendt
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

5.  Bile Duct Injury-from Injury to Repair: an Analysis of Management and Outcome.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Sundeep Singh Saluja; Mohammed Nayeem; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Nilesh Patil
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  Current management of biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jennifer G Hall; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  [Interventions for benign biliary strictures].

Authors:  A Lubienski; M Duex; K Lubienski; J Blietz; G W Kauffmann; T Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Hepaticojejunostomy vs. end-to-end biliary reconstructions in the treatment of iatrogenic bile duct injuries.

Authors:  Beata Jabłońska; Paweł Lampe; Marek Olakowski; Zygmunt Górka; Andrzej Lekstan; Tomasz Gruszka
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Incidence and consequence of an hepatic artery injury in patients with postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Arnaud Alves; Olivier Farges; Jérôme Nicolet; Thierry Watrin; Alain Sauvanet; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Ontario: does ICD-9 coding indicate true incidence?

Authors:  B Taylor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-24       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.