Literature DB >> 19266245

Hepaticojejunostomy vs. end-to-end biliary reconstructions in the treatment of iatrogenic bile duct injuries.

Beata Jabłońska1, Paweł Lampe, Marek Olakowski, Zygmunt Górka, Andrzej Lekstan, Tomasz Gruszka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retrospective comparison of short- and long-term results and quality of life in patients treated for iatrogenic bile duct injuries (IBDI) with Roux-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) or end-to-end ductal anastomosis (EE).
METHODS: Between January 1990 and March 2005, 94 patients underwent reconstructive surgery for IBDI: 49, Roux-Y HJ, and 45, EE.
RESULTS: Early postoperative complications were observed in 12 (24.5%) patients undergoing HJ and three (6.7%) undergoing EE (p = 0.0239). Reoperations in the early postoperative period were performed in four (8%) patients after HJ and in zero patients after EE. Following HJ, one (2%) hospital death occurred due to acute circulatory insufficiency. Long-term results were evaluated in 69 (72%) patients. Postoperative mean weight gain was significantly higher after EE than HJ (p = 0.0191). Recurrent stricture was observed in two (5.3%) patients after HJ and three (9.6%) after EE (p = 0.6509). Terblanche long-term results were comparable in both groups (p = 0.3173). Good Karnofsky quality of life was comparable in both groups (p = 0.8377).
CONCLUSIONS: More early complications occurred after HJ than after EE. Long-term results were comparable after both reconstructive methods. After EE, patients achieved a higher weight gain than after HJ. Quality of life in both groups was comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19266245     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0841-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  33 in total

1.  High or low hepaticojejunostomy for bile duct strictures?

Authors:  J Terblanche; C S Worthley; R A Spence; J E Krige
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Current management of biliary strictures.

Authors:  Jennifer G Hall; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S A Martin; J L Cameron; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; S Kaushal; J Coleman; A C Venbrux; S J Savader; F A Osterman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Recurrent biliary stricture. Patterns of recurrence and outcome of surgical therapy.

Authors:  C A Pellegrini; M J Thomas; L W Way
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Management of benign biliary strictures: biliary enteric anastomosis vs endoscopic stenting.

Authors:  A Tocchi; G Mazzoni; G Liotta; G Costa; L Lepre; M Miccini; E De Masi; M A Lamazza; E Fiori
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-02

7.  The long-term outcome of hepaticojejunostomy in the treatment of benign bile duct strictures.

Authors:  A Tocchi; G Costa; L Lepre; G Liotta; G Mazzoni; A Sita
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S C Schmidt; J M Langrehr; R E Hintze; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  To stent or not to stent bilioenteric anastomosis after iatrogenic injury: a dilemma not answered?

Authors:  Miguel Angel Mercado; Carlos Chan; Héctor Orozco; Gumaro Cano-Gutiérrez; Juan Manuel Chaparro; Erick Galindo; Mario Vilatobá; Gilberto Samaniego-Arvizu
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-01

10.  Management of major bile duct injury associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T N Robinson; G V Stiegmann; J D Durham; S I Johnson; M E Wachs; A D Serra; D A Kumpe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury and its sequelae: pathogenesis, classification, and management.

Authors:  Kishore G S Bharathy; Sanjay S Negi
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-03

Review 2.  Iatrogenic bile duct injuries: etiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Beata Jabłońska; Paweł Lampe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Bile Duct Injury after Cholecystectomy: Surgical Therapy.

Authors:  Bernhard W Renz; Florian Bösch; Martin K Angele
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 4.  Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.

Authors:  Anne Marthe Schreuder; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink; Povilas Ignatavicius; Antanas Gulbinas; Giedrius Barauskas; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Risk factors for increased resource utilization and critical care complications in patients undergoing hepaticojejunostomy for biliary injuries.

Authors:  Nicholas Jackson; Adam Dugan; Daniel Davenport; Michael Daily; Malay Shah; Jonathan Berger; Roberto Gedaly
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Treatment of complicated hepatic cystic hydatidosis with intrabiliary rupture by pericystectomy in combination with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  Hongqiang Yang; Jingxia Tang; Xinyu Peng; Shijie Zhang; Hong Sun; Hailong Lv; Jiang Li; Xiaoping Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-20

7.  An end-to-end anastomosis model of guinea pig bile duct: A 6-mo observation.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Zhang; Yuan-Hu Tian; Zhi Xu; Li-Xin Wang; Chun-Sheng Hou; Xiao-Feng Ling; Xiao-Si Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction after radical resection of Bismuth IIIa hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wen-Guang Wu; Jun Gu; Ping Dong; Jian-Hua Lu; Mao-Lan Li; Xiang-Song Wu; Jia-Hua Yang; Lin Zhang; Qi-Chen Ding; Hao Weng; Qian Ding; Ying-Bin Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Factors Affecting Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes After Bilioenteric Reconstruction for Post-cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury: Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre.

Authors:  Virinder K Bansal; Asuri Krishna; Mahesh C Misra; Prem Prakash; Subodh Kumar; Karthik Rajan; Divya Babu; Pramod Garg; Atin Kumar; Rajeshwari S
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 10.  End-to-end ductal anastomosis in biliary reconstruction: indications and limitations.

Authors:  Beata Jabłonska
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.