Literature DB >> 8342992

Open cholecystectomy. A contemporary analysis of 42,474 patients.

J J Roslyn1, G S Binns, E F Hughes, K Saunders-Kirkwood, M J Zinner, J A Cates.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated, in a large, heterogeneous population, the outcome of open cholecystectomy as it is currently practiced. SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND DATA: Although cholecystectomy has been the gold standard of treatment for cholelithiasis for more than 100 years, it has recently been challenged by the introduction of several new modalities including laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Efforts to define the role of these alternative treatments have been hampered by the lack of contemporary data regarding open cholecystectomy.
METHODS: A population-based study was performed examining all open cholecystectomies performed by surgeons in an eastern and western state during a recent 12-month period. Data compiled consisted of a computerized analysis of Uniformed Billing (UB-82) discharge analysis information from all non-Veterans Administration (VA), acute care hospitals in California (Office of Statewide Planning and Development [OSHPD]) and in Maryland (Health Services Cost Review Commission [HSCRC]) between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1989. This data base was supplemented with a 5% random sample of Medicare UB-82 data from patients who were discharged between October 1, 1988, and September 30, 1989. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy were identified based on diagnosis-related groups (DRG-197 and DRG-198), and then classified by Principal Diagnosis and divided into three clinically homogeneous subgroups: acute cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, and complicated cholecystitis.
RESULTS: A total of 42,474 patients were analyzed, which represents approximately 8% of all patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the United States in any recent 12-month period. The overall mortality rate was 0.17% and the incidence rate of bile duct injuries was approximately 0.2%. The mortality rate was 0.03% in patients younger than 65 years of age and 0.5% in those older than 65 years of age. Mortality rate, length of hospital stay, and charges were all significantly correlated (p < 0.001) with age, admission status (elective, urgent, or emergent), and disease status.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that open cholecystectomy currently is a very safe, effective treatment for cholelithiasis and is being performed with near zero mortality. The ultimate role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy needs to be defined in the context of current and contemporary data regarding open cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8342992      PMCID: PMC1242921          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199308000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The economic burden of gallstone lithotripsy. Will cost determine its fate?

Authors:  W H Nealon; F Urrutia; D Fleming; J C Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Historical events in biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  F Glenn; W R Grafe
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1966-11

Review 4.  Complications of cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M L Henry; L C Carey
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Effect of high and low doses of ursodeoxycholic acid on gallstone dissolution in humans.

Authors:  G Salen; A Colalillo; D Verga; E Bagan; G S Tint; S Shefer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy versus cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones.

Authors:  E B Bass; E P Steinberg; H A Pitt; G P Saba; K D Lillemoe; D R Kafonek; T R Gadacz; T A Gordon; G F Anderson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Davidoff; T N Pappas; E A Murray; D J Hilleren; R D Johnson; M E Baker; G E Newman; P B Cotton; W C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Chenodiol (chenodeoxycholic acid) for dissolution of gallstones: the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. A controlled trial of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  L J Schoenfield; J M Lachin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Experience with 375 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R W Bailey; K A Zucker; J L Flowers; W A Scovill; S M Graham; A L Imbembo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  94 in total

1.  Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Néstor A Gómez; Ludwig R Alvarez; Alfredo Mite; Jean P Andrade; José R Alvarez; Paola E Vargas; Nancy E Tomalá; Alex F Vivas; Jorge A Zapatier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Major bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effect of surgical repair on quality of life.

Authors:  Genevieve B Melton; Keith D Lillemoe; John L Cameron; Patricia A Sauter; JoAnn Coleman; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Mortality after a cholecystectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Gabriel Sandblom; Per Videhult; Ylva Crona Guterstam; Annika Svenner; Omid Sadr-Azodi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy depends upon the establishment of a critical view of safety.

Authors:  Yuichi Yamashita; Taizo Kimura; Sumio Matsumoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Bile Duct Injury-from Injury to Repair: an Analysis of Management and Outcome.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Sundeep Singh Saluja; Mohammed Nayeem; Barjesh Chander Sharma; Nilesh Patil
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study.

Authors:  Patrick J Worth; Taranjeet Kaur; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Incidence and consequence of an hepatic artery injury in patients with postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures.

Authors:  Arnaud Alves; Olivier Farges; Jérôme Nicolet; Thierry Watrin; Alain Sauvanet; Jacques Belghiti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Usefulness of gallbladder ejection fraction estimation to predict the recurrence of biliary pain in patients with symptomatic gallstones who did not undergo cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; Jong Kyun Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Poong Lyul Rhee; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.