Literature DB >> 8503764

The early experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Oregon.

K E Deveney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a profile of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) across the state of Oregon with regard to the safety of the procedure, use of intraoperative cholangiograms, and requirements for granting surgeons privileges to perform LC and other laparoscopic procedures.
DESIGN: Single-mailing survey to surgeons and chiefs of surgery in Oregon.
SETTING: The state of Oregon. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Surgeons and chiefs of surgery in Oregon. INTERVENTION: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Numbers of procedures performed, deaths, complications, and requirements for surgical privileges.
RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of surgeons returned the questionnaire, as did 53% of the chiefs of surgery. Four deaths (0.04%), 244 complications (2.5%), and 27 bile duct injuries (0.28%) were reported in 9597 patients undergoing LC. Most surgeons (55%) obtained intraoperative cholangiograms routinely. Requirements for the privilege to perform LC varied among hospitals. Although the accuracy of this self-reported survey is uncertain, the results agree with those of other reports published to date.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being performed with acceptable safety, although the process of granting surgeons the privilege to perform this and other "new" laparoscopic procedures should be standardized according to established guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8503764     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420180025005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  9 in total

Review 1.  Spilled gallstones--complications of abdominal-wall abscesses. Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  C B Carlin; R B Kent; H L Laws
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly.

Authors:  A Firilas; B E Duke; M H Max
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report from a single center.

Authors:  Konstantinos Vagenas; Stavros N Karamanakos; Charalambos Spyropoulos; Spyros Panagiotopoulos; Menelaos Karanikolas; Michalis Stavropoulos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow-up after combined surgical and radiologic management.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S A Martin; J L Cameron; C J Yeo; M A Talamini; S Kaushal; J Coleman; A C Venbrux; S J Savader; F A Osterman; H A Pitt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Pneumothorax associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R L Friedman; I H Friedman; C K McSherry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster.

Authors:  S J Savader; K D Lillemoe; C A Prescott; A B Winick; A C Venbrux; G B Lund; S E Mitchell; J L Cameron; F A Osterman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Open, small-incision, or laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. An overview of Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group reviews.

Authors:  Frederik Keus; Hein G Gooszen; Cornelis Jhm van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report on the community hospital experience in Hokkaido.

Authors:  N Kurauchi; N Kamii; K Kazui; Y Saji; J Uchino
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 9.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.