Literature DB >> 919076

Transmission microscropy of unmodified biological materials: comparative radiation dosages with electrons and ultrasoft x-ray photons.

D Sayre, J Kirz, R Feder, D M Kim, E Spiller.   

Abstract

The minimum radiation dosage in a specimen consistent with transmission microscopy at resolution d and specimen thickness t is calculated for model specimens resembling biological materials in their natural state. The calculations cover 10(4)-10(7) eV electrons and 1.3-90 A photons in a number of microscopy modes. The results indicate that over a considerable part of the (t,d)-plane transmission microscopy on such specimens can be carried out at lower dosage with photons than with electrons. Estimates of the maximum resolutions obtainable with electrons and photons, consistent with structural survival of the specimen, are obtained, as are data on optimal operating conditions for microscopy with the two particles.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 919076     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(76)91997-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultramicroscopy        ISSN: 0304-3991            Impact factor:   2.689


  15 in total

Review 1.  Neutron microscopy. The low-damage imaging of specialized organic materials.

Authors:  A Steinbach
Journal:  Cell Biophys       Date:  1985-03

2.  Optimizing detector geometry for trace element mapping by X-ray fluorescence.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Sophie-Charlotte Gleber; Chris Jacobsen; Janos Kirz; Stefan Vogt
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.689

3.  Nanoscale x-ray imaging of circuit features without wafer etching.

Authors:  Junjing Deng; Young Pyo Hong; Si Chen; Youssef S G Nashed; Tom Peterka; Anthony J F Levi; John Damoulakis; Sayan Saha; Travis Eiles; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Phys Rev B       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 4.  Visualizing cell architecture and molecular location using soft x-ray tomography and correlated cryo-light microscopy.

Authors:  Gerry McDermott; Mark A Le Gros; Carolyn A Larabell
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 12.703

Review 5.  Assaying three-dimensional cellular architecture using X-ray tomographic and correlated imaging approaches.

Authors:  Peter O Bayguinov; Max R Fisher; James A J Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  An assessment of the resolution limitation due to radiation-damage in x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Authors:  M R Howells; T Beetz; H N Chapman; C Cui; J M Holton; C J Jacobsen; J Kirz; E Lima; S Marchesini; H Miao; D Sayre; D A Shapiro; J C H Spence; D Starodub
Journal:  J Electron Spectros Relat Phenomena       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.957

7.  Data preparation and evaluation techniques for x-ray diffraction microscopy.

Authors:  Jan Steinbrener; Johanna Nelson; Xiaojing Huang; Stefano Marchesini; David Shapiro; Joshua J Turner; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Putting molecules in their place.

Authors:  Bertrand P Cinquin; Myan Do; Gerry McDermott; Alison D Walters; Markko Myllys; Elizabeth A Smith; Orna Cohen-Fix; Mark A Le Gros; Carolyn A Larabell
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.429

9.  Signal-to-noise and radiation exposure considerations in conventional and diffraction x-ray microscopy.

Authors:  Xiaojing Huang; Huijie Miao; Jan Steinbrener; Johanna Nelson; David Shapiro; Andrew Stewart; Joshua Turner; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Relative merits and limiting factors for x-ray and electron microscopy of thick, hydrated organic materials.

Authors:  Ming Du; Chris Jacobsen
Journal:  Ultramicroscopy       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 2.689

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.