Literature DB >> 9181544

Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: a preliminary study.

T A Burnett1, J E Senner, C R Larson.   

Abstract

Auditory feedback has been suggested to be important for voice fundamental frequency (F0) control. The present study featured a new technique for testing this hypothesis by which the pitch of a subject's voice was modulated, fed back over earphones, and the resultant change in the emitted voice F0 was measured. The responses of 67 normal, healthy young adults were recorded as they attempted to ignore intermittent upward or downward shifts in pitch feedback while they sustained steady vowel sounds (/a/) or sang musical scales. Ninety-six percent of subjects increased their F0 when the feedback pitch was decreased, and 78% of subjects decreased their F0 when the pitch feedback was increased. Latencies of responses ranged from 104 to 223 ms. Results indicate people normally rely on pitch feedback to control voice F0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9181544     DOI: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80079-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  48 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The role of auditory feedback in sustaining vocal vibrato.

Authors:  Ciara Leydon; Jay J Bauer; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The functional neuroanatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The neural changes in connectivity of the voice network during voice pitch perturbation.

Authors:  Sabina G Flagmeier; Kimberly L Ray; Amy L Parkinson; Karl Li; Robert Vargas; Larry R Price; Angela R Laird; Charles R Larson; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Laryngeal reflex responses are not modulated during human voice and respiratory tasks.

Authors:  Victor M Henriquez; Geralyn M Schulz; Steven Bielamowicz; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Speech disruption during delayed auditory feedback with simultaneous visual feedback.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Danielle Striemer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speaker compensation for local perturbation of fricative acoustic feedback.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Nicole M Russo; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Pitch Shifting With the Commercially Available Eventide Eclipse: Intended and Unintended Changes to the Speech Signal.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Ashling A Lupiani; Katharine R Kolin; Roxanne K Segina; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.