Literature DB >> 31251880

Pitch Shifting With the Commercially Available Eventide Eclipse: Intended and Unintended Changes to the Speech Signal.

Elizabeth S Heller Murray1, Ashling A Lupiani1, Katharine R Kolin1, Roxanne K Segina1, Cara E Stepp1,2,3.   

Abstract

Purpose This study details the intended and unintended consequences of pitch shifting with the commercially available Eventide Eclipse. Method Ten vocally healthy participants ( M = 22.0 years; 6 cisgender females, 4 cisgender males) produced a sustained /ɑ/, creating an input signal. This input signal was processed in near real time by the Eventide Eclipse to create an output signal that was either not shifted (0 cents), shifted +100 cents, or shifted -100 cents. Shifts occurred either throughout the entire vocalization or for a 200-ms period after vocal onset. Results Input signals were compared to output signals to examine potential changes. Average pitch-shift magnitudes were within 1 cent of the intended pitch shift. Measured pitch-shift length for intended 200-ms shifts was between 5.9% and 21.7% less than expected, based on the portion of shift selected for measurement. The delay between input and output signals was an average of 11.1 ms. Trials shifted +100 cents had a longer delay than trials shifted -100 or 0 cents. The first 2 formants (F1, F2) shifted in the direction of the pitch shift, with F1 shifting 6.5% and F2 shifting 6.0%. Conclusions The Eventide Eclipse is an accurate pitch-shifting hardware that can be used to explore voice and vocal motor control. The pitch-shifting algorithm shifts all frequencies, resulting in a subsequent change in F1 and F2 during pitch-shifted trials. Researchers using this device should be mindful of stimuli selection to avoid confusion during data interpretation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31251880      PMCID: PMC6808353          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0408

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Attentional demands modulate sensorimotor learning induced by persistent exposure to changes in auditory feedback.

Authors:  Nichole E Scheerer; Anupreet K Tumber; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Time-dependent neural processing of auditory feedback during voice pitch error detection.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sex-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalization.

Authors:  Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Jeffery A Jones; Dongfeng Huang; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of duration of pitch-shifted feedback on vocal responses in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S Kiran; C R Larson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; L A Getty; M J Clark; K Wheeler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mollaei; Douglas M Shiller; Shari R Baum; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  6 in total

1.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Feedback and Feedforward Auditory-Motor Processes for Voice and Articulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Ayoub Daliri; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ashling A Lupiani; Dante Cilento; Nicole M Enos; Hasini R Weerathunge; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

5.  Relationships between vocal pitch perception and production: a developmental perspective.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  It's About Time: Minimizing Hardware and Software Latencies in Speech Research With Real-Time Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Kwang S Kim; Hantao Wang; Ludo Max
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.297

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.