D P Pope1, A J Silman, N M Cherry, C Pritchard, G J Macfarlane. 1. Arthritis Research Campaign Epidemiology Unit, School of Epidemiology and Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. danpope@liverpool.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the individual and combined associations of physical and psychosocial working environment with disabling shoulder pain and to identify groups at "high risk" for shoulder pain. METHODS: A cross sectional survey was conducted at five manual occupational settings in south Manchester, United Kingdom (n=775, 83%). RESULTS: Both the duration of occupational physical demands (working postures, manual handling activities, and repetitive arm movements) and psychosocial working environment (psychological demands and lack of opportunity to learn new skills) were found to be significantly associated with shoulder pain. Three occupational factors identified a high risk group for shoulder pain: duration of lifting with one hand (prevalence rate ratio (PRR) (highest third) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 2.8), duration of working above shoulder level (PRR (highest third) 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.3), and whether employees found their work stressful (PRR (highest third) 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1). In addition, a measure of psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score) was found to identify a group at high risk for shoulder pain (PRR (highest third) 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.9). In employees exposed to three or more of these factors, 79% (23/29) reported shoulder pain compared with only 16% (56/353) of those not exposed to any. CONCLUSION: This study has identified a variety of occupational physical demands and psychosocial factors associated with shoulder pain. It has also identified groups of employees at a "high risk" for shoulder pain by their exposure to both physical and psychosocial factors.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the individual and combined associations of physical and psychosocial working environment with disabling shoulder pain and to identify groups at "high risk" for shoulder pain. METHODS: A cross sectional survey was conducted at five manual occupational settings in south Manchester, United Kingdom (n=775, 83%). RESULTS: Both the duration of occupational physical demands (working postures, manual handling activities, and repetitive arm movements) and psychosocial working environment (psychological demands and lack of opportunity to learn new skills) were found to be significantly associated with shoulder pain. Three occupational factors identified a high risk group for shoulder pain: duration of lifting with one hand (prevalence rate ratio (PRR) (highest third) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4 to 2.8), duration of working above shoulder level (PRR (highest third) 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.3), and whether employees found their work stressful (PRR (highest third) 1.4, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.1). In addition, a measure of psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) score) was found to identify a group at high risk for shoulder pain (PRR (highest third) 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.9). In employees exposed to three or more of these factors, 79% (23/29) reported shoulder pain compared with only 16% (56/353) of those not exposed to any. CONCLUSION: This study has identified a variety of occupational physical demands and psychosocial factors associated with shoulder pain. It has also identified groups of employees at a "high risk" for shoulder pain by their exposure to both physical and psychosocial factors.
Authors: K Ohlsson; G A Hansson; I Balogh; U Strömberg; B Pålsson; C Nordander; L Rylander; S Skerfving Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: J P Bonde; S Mikkelsen; J H Andersen; N Fallentin; J Baelum; S W Svendsen; J F Thomsen; P Frost; A Kaergaard Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: François Desmeules; Jennifer Boudreault; Clermont E Dionne; Pierre Frémont; Véronique Lowry; Joy C MacDermid; Jean-Sébastien Roy Journal: J Occup Health Date: 2016-08-04 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Jamaan Al-Zahrani; Mamdouh M Shubair; Sameer Al-Ghamdi; Khaled K Aldossari; Majid Alsalamah; Badr F Al-Khateeb; Abdulkarim Saeed; Saeed Alshahrani; Aseel Salem AlSuwaidan; Abdullah A Alrasheed; Ashraf El-Metwally Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Björn Gerdle; Jonas Björk; Lars Cöster; Kg Henriksson; Chris Henriksson; Ann Bengtsson Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2008-07-15 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Sultan Ayoub Meo; Zaid Fahad Alsaaran; Moayad Khalid Alshehri; Mohammed Azam Khashougji; Abdul Aziz Zayed Almeterk; Saif Fraj Almutairi; Saad Fahad Alsaeed Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 1.088