Literature DB >> 11600729

Work correlates of back problems and activity restriction due to musculoskeletal disorders in the Canadian national population health survey (NPHS) 1994-5 data.

D C Cole1, S A Ibrahim, H S Shannon, F Scott, J Eyles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in the Canadian working population and to determine cross sectional associations between such problems and work factors, particularly job strain and physical demand variables.
METHODS: The Canadian 1994 national population health survey (NPHS) sampled 4230 working men and 4043 working women (ages 18-64) who answered an abbreviated version of the job content questionnaire. Workers were classified into four strain categories: high, passive, active, and low. Outcomes were restricted activity due to musculoskeletal disorders and the diagnosis of a back problem (both yes or no). Survey weights were incorporated to allow for different probabilities of selection. Logistic regression analyses were carried out separately for women and men, controlling for sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS: Prevalence of chronic back problems diagnosed by a health practitioner was 14.5% among men and 12.5% among women. Men had a 6.6% prevalence of restricted activity due to musculoskeletal disorders, whereas the corresponding figure for women was 5.3%. Women, but not men, in high strain jobs were more likely to report both back problems (odds ratio (OR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.14 to 2.28) and restricted activity (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.48) compared with those in low strain jobs. High physical exertion was an independent predictor of back problems in both sexes. For both men and women, low social support at work and high job insecurity were independent predictors of restricted activity due to musculoskeletal disorders. Conversely, chronic back problems contributed to explanation of high job strain among women (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.39) and high physical exertion among men (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.77), whereas restricted activity due to musculoskeletal disorders contributed to explanation of high job insecurity in both sexes.
CONCLUSIONS: Associations of interest between work stressors and musculoskeletal problems in this cross sectional study provide evidence for physical and psychosocial factors both affecting disability and being affected by disability in a working population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600729      PMCID: PMC1740062          DOI: 10.1136/oem.58.11.728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  24 in total

1.  Validation of a questionnaire for assessing physical work load.

Authors:  S Hollmann; F Klimmer; K H Schmidt; H Kylian
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Correlates of back problems and back-related disability in the United States.

Authors:  E L Hurwitz; H Morgenstern
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Standardized mortality ratios and the "healthy worker effect": Scratching beneath the surface.

Authors:  A J McMichael
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

Review 4.  The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis.

Authors:  D Pfeffermann
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 5.  Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I: What do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins.

Authors:  J W Frank; M S Kerr; A S Brooker; S E DeMaio; A Maetzel; H S Shannon; T J Sullivan; R W Norman; R P Wells
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Life conditions of persons with and without low-back pain.

Authors:  H Saraste; G Hultman
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1987

7.  Long-term back problems and physical work exposures in the 1990 Ontario Health Survey.

Authors:  J P Liira; H S Shannon; L W Chambers; T A Haines
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Psychosocial factors in the workplace--do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study.

Authors:  A C Papageorgiou; G J Macfarlane; E Thomas; P R Croft; M I Jayson; A J Silman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Associations between self-rated psychosocial work conditions and musculoskeletal symptoms and signs. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group.

Authors:  A Toomingas; T Theorell; H Michélsen; R Nordemar
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 10.  The economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditions. National Arthritis Data Work Groups.

Authors:  E Yelin; L F Callahan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-10
View more
  12 in total

1.  Transitions in self-reported musculoskeletal pain and interference with activities among newspaper workers.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael Manno; Dorcas Beaton; Michael Swift
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

2.  Occupations associated with a high risk of self-reported back pain: representative outcomes of a back pain prevalence study in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Slawomira Lipinski; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictors of work-related repetitive strain injuries in a population cohort.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Selahadin Ibrahim; Harry S Shannon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Psychosocial working conditions and self-reported health in a representative sample of wage-earners: a test of the different hypotheses of the Demand-Control-Support-Model.

Authors:  Christophe Vanroelen; Katia Levecque; Fred Louckx
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  [Back pain and social status among the working population: what is the association? Results from a German general population survey].

Authors:  C O Schmidt; J Moock; R A Fahland; Y Y-S Feng; T Kohlmann
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Workplace stress, lifestyle and social factors as correlates of back pain: a representative study of the German working population.

Authors:  Sven Schneider; Holger Schmitt; Silke Zoller; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Determinants of "return to work in good health" among workers with back pain who consult in primary care settings: a 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  Clermont E Dionne; Renée Bourbonnais; Pierre Frémont; Michel Rossignol; Susan R Stock; Arie Nouwen; Isabelle Larocque; Eric Demers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  General practitioners and patients with psychological stress at work.

Authors:  M Souville; S Cabut; A Viau; G Iarmarcovai; S Arnaud; P Verger
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-22

9.  Assessing the impact of waste picking on musculoskeletal disorders among waste pickers in Mumbai, India: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shrikant Singh; Praveen Chokhandre
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Psychosocial Work Factors and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study among Swedish Flight Baggage Handlers.

Authors:  Eva L Bergsten; S E Mathiassen; E Vingård
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.