Literature DB >> 9157137

Vulval swabs as alternative specimens for ligase chain reaction detection of genital chlamydial infection in women.

A Stary1, B Najim, H H Lee.   

Abstract

A ligase chain reaction (LCR)-based assay was recently shown to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis not only in cervical specimens but also in first-void urine (FVU) specimens form women. The suitability of using vulval swabs as an alternative specimen that can be obtained by noninvasive means for the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection by LCR was investigated. In a first study of 169 women, vulval, endocervical, and urethral swabs were tested by LCR, culture, and a combination of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) followed by confirmation by direct fluorescent-antibody assay (DFA), and the results were compared with those obtained by testing FVU specimens by LCR and EIA-DFA by using a specimen from an infected patient as a reference standard. Of the 169 women tested, 27 (16%) were shown to be infected. Whereas LCR showed high sensitivities with all specimen types (85.2% for vulval, urine, and endocervical specimens; 92.6% for urethral swabs), the sensitivities of culture and EIA-DFA were high only with endocervical swabs (74.1 and 70.4%, respectively), being 22.2 and 40.7%, respectively, with vulval swabs. In addition, urine testing by EIA-DFA also showed a poor sensitivity (48.1%). In order to further compare LCR performance with vulval specimens to that with FVU specimens, a second study was carried out with specimens from 312 women, of whom 26 were infected. Comparable sensitivity was obtained by LCR with vulval swabs (88.5%; 23 of 26) and FVU specimens (92.3%; 24 of 26). The results indicate that vulval swabs may serve as suitable alternative to specimens that can be obtained by noninvasive means for the detection of C. trachomatis by LCR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9157137      PMCID: PMC229685          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.4.836-838.1997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Noninvasive tests for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection: application of ligase chain reaction to first-catch urine specimens of women.

Authors:  J Schachter; J Moncada; R Whidden; H Shaw; G Bolan; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Comparison of urethral swabs, urine, and urinary sediment for the isolation of Chlamydia.

Authors:  T F Smith; L A Weed
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Schachter; W E Stamm; T C Quinn; W W Andrews; J D Burczak; H H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first-void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; H Lee; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W E Stamm; W M McCormack; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Comparison of DNA amplification methods for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic military recruits.

Authors:  A Stary; S Tomazic-Allen; B Choueiri; J Burczak; K Steyrer; H Lee
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Amplification of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  B J Dille; C C Butzen; L G Birkenmeyer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men and women by testing first-void urine by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D Jang; H Lee; J D Burczak; H Hu; J Sellors; S J Tomazic-Allen; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.

Authors:  H H Lee; M A Chernesky; J Schachter; J D Burczak; W W Andrews; S Muldoon; G Leckie; W E Stamm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from women by ligase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Bassiri; H Y Hu; M A Domeika; J Burczak; L O Svensson; H H Lee; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  21 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis diagnostics.

Authors:  M A Chernesky
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.519

2.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by strand displacement amplification and relevance of the amplification control for use with vaginal swab specimens.

Authors:  Lisa A Cosentino; Daniel V Landers; Sharon L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Current Issues in Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Robert L. Cook; Lars ØStergaard
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 4.  Chlamydia screening: which sample for which technique?

Authors:  A Stary
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-04

5.  Comparison of Digene hybrid capture 2 and conventional culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in cervical specimens.

Authors:  Ling H Darwin; Allison P Cullen; Patrick M Arthur; Carole D Long; Kim R Smith; Jennifer L Girdner; Edward W Hook; Thomas C Quinn; Attila T Lorincz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Chlamydia trachomatis load at matched anatomic sites: implications for screening strategies.

Authors:  Claude-Edouard C Michel; Christopher Sonnex; Christopher A Carne; John A White; Jose Paolo V Magbanua; Elpidio Cesar B Nadala; Helen H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of a polymer conjugate-enhanced enzyme immunoassay to ligase chain reaction for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical swabs.

Authors:  M Chernesky; D Jang; D Copes; J Patel; A Petrich; K Biers; A Sproston; J Kapala
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in vaginal specimens from female commercial sex workers using a new improved enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  M Tanaka; H Nakayama; H Yoshida; K Takahashi; T Nagafuji; T Hagiwara; J Kumazawa
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  Performance of transcription-mediated amplification and ligase chain reaction assays for detection of chlamydial infection in urogenital samples obtained by invasive and noninvasive methods.

Authors:  A Stary; E Schuh; M Kerschbaumer; B Götz; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  The laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  Max A Chernesky
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.