Literature DB >> 9152453

Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery.

Y Kawaguchi1, H Matsui, H Tsuji.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Serum concentrations of creatine phosphokinase and its isoenzyme were measured serially in 47 patients who underwent lumbar surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the significance of postoperative creatine phosphokinase MM levels as indicators of muscle trauma after lumbar surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The authors of the present study previously have reported on iatrogenic back muscle injury in an animal model and in man. However, the relationship between the change of the creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme level and muscle injury after surgery has not been clarified.
METHODS: Peripheral venous blood samples were collected serially before surgery, just after surgery, and at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after surgery. The serum concentration of total creatine phosphokinase and its isoenzymes was measured by agarose gel electrophoresis. The serial postoperative change of the creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme concentration was evaluated with respect to age, gender, body weight, types and levels of surgery, and surgery time.
RESULTS: Creatine phosphokinase MM activity increased after surgery and reached a maximum value 1 day after surgery, followed by recovery to the normal value 1 week after surgery. The maximum concentration of creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme in posterior lumbar surgery was significantly higher than that in anterior surgery (P = 0.04). It was significantly higher in men than in women (P = 0.02). Serum concentration of creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme showed no significant correlation to the extent of muscle exposure and surgery time.
CONCLUSION: The time course of postoperative serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme activity is correlated with the histologic changes of the back muscles after surgery. The concentration of creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme in posterior lumbar surgery was significantly higher than that in anterior surgery. It was also significantly higher in men than in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152453     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach and the conventional posterior open approach for thoracolumbar fractures, using MRI, histological and electrophysiological analyses of the multifidus muscle.

Authors:  Liu Junhui; Pang Zhengbao; Xu Wenbin; Hao Lu; Li Shengyun; Fan Shunwu; Zhao Fengdong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Jinhua Chen; Hao Xie; Weizhong Tian; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy.

Authors:  Ryuichi Sasaoka; Hiroaki Nakamura; Sadahiko Konishi; Ryuichi Nagayama; Eisuke Suzuki; Hidetomi Terai; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Authors:  Zhi-Jun Hu; Xiang-Qian Fang; Shun-Wu Fan
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-02-17

7.  Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period.

Authors:  Beom-Seok Park; Young-Joon Kwon; Yu-Sam Won; Hyun-Chul Shin
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-09-30

8.  Perioperative and short-term advantages of mini-open approach for lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  J Rodríguez-Vela; A Lobo-Escolar; E Joven-Aliaga; A Herrera; J Vicente; E Suñén; A Loste; A Tabuenca
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Seung Jae Hyun; Young Baeg Kim; Yang Soo Kim; Seung Won Park; Taek Kyun Nam; Hyun Jong Hong; Jeong Taik Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Microdialysis of paraspinal muscle in healthy volunteers and patients underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Gang Ren; Søren Eiskjaer; Jon Kaspersen; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.