Literature DB >> 23417108

Iatrogenic injury to the erector spinae during posterior lumbar spine surgery: underlying anatomical considerations, preventable root causes, and surgical tips and tricks.

Zhi-Jun Hu1, Xiang-Qian Fang, Shun-Wu Fan.   

Abstract

The approach-related morbidity resulting from iatrogenic erector spinae injury in posterior lumbar surgery has become an increasing concern for spine surgeons. Many studies have explained the injury mechanisms and reported new surgical approaches to prevent this iatrogenic injury from their own point of views, but there is still no systemic information for a thorough understanding of this iatrogenic erector spinae injury that may give spine surgeons practical advices in their individual operations. We consequently reviewed the literature on the anatomy of erector spinae, causes of injury, and relative minimally invasive approaches. We found that the local anatomic structures make the erector spinae vulnerable to injury during posterior lumbar surgery, especially the medial multifidus which is innervated only by the medial branch of the dorsal ramus, with no intersegmental nerve supply as in the other paraspinal muscles, and the injury factors mainly include dissection, retraction, denervation, and immobility. Studies suggest that the goal of prevention is to preserve the physiological structure of erector spinae and to avoid or limit the injury causes: approaches through spatium intermusculare and approaches with endoscope and tubular retractor system can prevent the erector spinae from injury by less dissection and retraction; non-fusion techniques may prevent the erector spinae from disuse atrophy by preserving the segmental motion and the adjacent erector spinae activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23417108     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-012-1167-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  49 in total

1.  The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery.

Authors:  Heath Taylor; Alison H McGregor; Siroos Medhi-Zadeh; Simon Richards; Nostrat Kahn; Jamshied Alaghband Zadeh; Sean P F Hughes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The medial branch of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Saito; Masami Yoshimoto; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Takayoshi Miyaki; Masahiro Itoh; Shogo Shimizu; Yoshiyuki Oi; Wolfgang Schmidt; Hanno Steinke
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation.

Authors:  Robert E Isaacs; Vinod K Podichetty; Paul Santiago; Faheem A Sandhu; John Spears; Kevin Kelly; Laurie Rice; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2005-08

4.  A technique for needle localization in paraspinal muscles with cadaveric confirmation.

Authors:  A J Haig; M Moffroid; S Henry; L Haugh; M Pope
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Segmental contribution toward total lumbar range of motion in disc replacement and fusions: a comparison of operative and adjacent levels.

Authors:  Joshua D Auerbach; Kristofer J Jones; Andrew H Milby; Okechukwu A Anakwenze; Richard A Balderston
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  1987 Volvo award in basic science. The morphology of the lumbar erector spinae.

Authors:  J E Macintosh; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The human lumbar dorsal rami.

Authors:  N Bogduk; A S Wilson; W Tynan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats.

Authors:  R Gejo; Y Kawaguchi; T Kondoh; E Tabuchi; H Matsui; K Torii; T Ono; T Kimura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Surgical results of the oblique paraspinal approach in upper lumbar disc herniation and thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Sang-Ho Lee; Ki-Hyoung Moon; Ho-Yeon Lee
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Histologic and electrophysiological changes of the paraspinal muscle after spinal fusion: an experimental study.

Authors:  Yong Hu; H B Leung; William W Lu; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Erector Spinal Muscular Schwannoma of the Dorsal Ramus Nerve: A Case Report.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Kim; Tack Geun Cho; Chang Hyun Kim; Jae Gon Moon; Ho Kook Lee
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 2.  How I do it? Biportal endoscopic spinal surgery (BESS) for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Chang Myong Choi; Je Tea Chung; Sang Jin Lee; Dae Jung Choi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Muscular changes after minimally invasive versus open spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: A literature review.

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Ulrike Schemmann; Christian Herren; Klemens Horst; Philipp Lichte; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape; Philipp Kobbe
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Limitations in clinical outcome after posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures do not correlate with dynamic trunk muscle dysfunction: an ultrasound controlled prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Miguel Pishnamaz; Ulrike Schemmann; Christian Herren; Klemens Horst; Frank Hildebrand; Philipp Kobbe; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.175

5.  Association between back muscle degeneration and spinal-pelvic parameters in patients with degenerative spinal kyphosis.

Authors:  Weiwei Xia; Han Fu; Zhenqi Zhu; Chenjun Liu; Kaifeng Wang; Shuai Xu; Haiying Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.