Literature DB >> 23990081

Time to disengage: holding an object influences the execution of rapid compensatory reach-to-grasp reactions for recovery from whole-body instability.

K Van Ooteghem1, B Lakhani, S Akram, V Miyasike Da Silva, W E McIlroy.   

Abstract

Rapid reach-to-grasp (RTG) reactions are important for balance recovery. Despite the benefit of having hands free to regain balance, people do not always release a handheld object. We investigated whether reluctance to release is related to central nervous system (CNS) processing delays that occur when the initial reaction is to drop the object rather than RTG. Young adults sat in a custom-designed chair that tilted backwards. Participants regained balance by reaching to a handle with hands free or while holding onto (1) a chair-fixed object or (2) a SMALL or LARGE free-moving object (unbreakable plastic tubes). EMG was collected from the upper limb to determine onset of reaction. Kinematic data from a digitized wrist marker were used to determine movement time. 9 of 10 participants released the object in every trial. Extensor digitorum onset occurred significantly later than anterior deltoid onset in all conditions. LARGE object release induced further delays in extensor onset while both SMALL and LARGE object release increased response and movement time. Object disengagement led to delays in perturbation-evoked, RTG reactions, particularly in the focal muscle (extensor digitorum) and when the objects' properties posed greater risk for a failed RTG response. We propose that time required for cognitive disengagement accounts for the observed delays. This study offers a potential explanation for the tendency to avoid disengaging from a handheld object during balance recovery. Results also provide insight into the challenges imposed upon the CNS during temporally urgent movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23990081     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3682-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Age-dependent variations in the directional sensitivity of balance corrections and compensatory arm movements in man.

Authors:  J H J Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger; A L Adkin; B R Bloem
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Aging and inhibitory control of action: cortico-subthalamic connection strength predicts stopping performance.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Restricting arm use enhances compensatory reactions of leg muscles during walking.

Authors:  John E Misiaszek; Emily M Krauss
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Reduced basal ganglia function when elderly switch between coordinated movement patterns.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Daniel J Goble; Annouchka Van Impe; Jeroen De Vos; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  The role of limb movements in maintaining upright stance: the "change-in-support" strategy.

Authors:  B E Maki; W E McIlroy
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1997-05

8.  Directional sensitivity of stretch reflexes and balance corrections for normal subjects in the roll and pitch planes.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J H Allum; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does the movement matter?: determinants of the latency of temporally urgent motor reactions.

Authors:  Bimal Lakhani; Karen Van Ooteghem; Veronica Miyasike-Dasilva; Sakineh Akram; Avril Mansfield; William E McIlroy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses.

Authors:  H C Diener; F B Horak; L M Nashner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of Holding Objects on the Occurrence of Head Impact in Falls by Older Adults: Evidence From Real-Life Falls in Long-Term Care.

Authors:  Vicki Komisar; Nataliya Shishov; Yijian Yang; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Promoting Generalized Learning in Balance Recovery Interventions.

Authors:  Sara A Harper; Anne Z Beethe; Christopher J Dakin; David A E Bolton
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  Inhibitory Control and Fall Prevention: Why Stopping Matters.

Authors:  David A E Bolton; James K Richardson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.