Literature DB >> 9147979

Hip impact velocities and body configurations for voluntary falls from standing height.

A J van den Kroonenberg1, W C Hayes, T A McMahon.   

Abstract

Fall dynamics have largely been ignored in the study of hip fracture etiology and in the development of hip fracture prevention strategies. In this study, we asked the following questions: (1) What are the ranges of hip impact velocities associated with a sideways fall from standing height? (2) What are the ranges of body configurations at impact? and (3) How do protective reflexes such as muscle activation or using an outstretched hand influence fall kinematics? To answer these questions, we recruited six young healthy athletes who performed voluntary sideways falls on a thick foam mattress. Several categories of falls were investigated: (a) muscle-active vs muscle-relaxed falls; (b) falls from a standing position or from walking; and (c) falls in which an outstretched arm was used to break the fall. Each fall was videotaped at 60 frames s(-1). Fall kinematics parameters were obtained by digitizing markers placed on anatomical points of interest. The mean value for vertical hip impact velocity was 2.75 ms(-1) (+ or - 0.42 ms(-1) [S.D.]). The mean value for trunk angle (the angle between the trunk and the vertical) was 17.3 degrees (+ or - 11.5 degrees [S.D.]). We found a 38 percent reduction in the trunk angle at impact, and a 7 percent reduction in hip impact velocity for relaxed vs muscle-active falls. Finally, regarding the. falls in which an outstretched arm was used, only two out of the six subjects were able to break the fall with their arm or hand. For the remaining subjects hip impact occurred first, followed by contact of the arm or hand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9147979     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00134-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

1.  A poisson process model for hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Zvi Schechner; Gangming Luo; Jonathan J Kaufman; Robert S Siffert
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction.

Authors:  Manabu Nankaku; Hideto Kanzaki; Tadao Tsuboyama; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Associations Between Lean Mass, Muscle Strength and Power, and Skeletal Size, Density and Strength in Older Men.

Authors:  Didier Chalhoub; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Andrew W Frank-Wilson; Nayana Nagaraj; Andrew R Hoffman; Nancy E Lane; Marcia L Stefanick; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Tien Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women.

Authors:  Katherine Neubecker Bachmann; Pouneh K Fazeli; Elizabeth A Lawson; Brian M Russell; Ariana D Riccio; Erinne Meenaghan; Anu V Gerweck; Kamryn Eddy; Tara Holmes; Mark Goldstein; Thomas Weigel; Seda Ebrahimi; Diane Mickley; Suzanne Gleysteen; Miriam A Bredella; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Impact direction from a fall influences the failure load of the proximal femur as much as age-related bone loss.

Authors:  T P Pinilla; K C Boardman; M L Bouxsein; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Prophylactic augmentation of the osteoporotic proximal femur-mission impossible?

Authors:  Peter Varga; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Michael Blauth; Markus Windolf
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

8.  The factor-of-risk biomechanical approach predicts hip fracture in men and women: the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A B Dufour; B Roberts; K E Broe; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein; M T Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip fracture types in men and women change differently with age.

Authors:  David A Tanner; Marita Kloseck; Richard G Crilly; Bert Chesworth; Jason Gilliland
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 10.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.