Literature DB >> 9147589

Regression calibration in failure time regression.

C Y Wang1, L Hsu, Z D Feng, R L Prentice.   

Abstract

In this paper we study a regression calibration method for failure time regression analysis when data on some covariates are missing or mismeasured. The method estimates the missing data based on the data structure estimated from a validation data set, a random subsample of the study cohort in which covariates are always observed. Ordinary Cox (1972; Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 187-220) regression is then applied to estimate the regression coefficients, using the observed covariates in the validation data set and the estimated covariates in the nonvalidation data set. The method can be easily implemented. We present the asymptotic theory of the proposed estimator. Finite sample performance is examined and compared with an estimated partial likelihood estimator and other related methods via simulation studies, where the proposed method performs well even though it is technically inconsistent. Finally, we illustrate the method with a mouse leukemia data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9147589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  46 in total

1.  A profile conditional likelihood approach for the semiparametric transformation regression model with missing covariates.

Authors:  H Y Chen; R J Little
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  SEMIPARAMETRIC ADDITIVE RISKS REGRESSION FOR TWO-STAGE DESIGN SURVIVAL STUDIES.

Authors:  Gang Li; Tong Tong Wu
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.261

3.  Bias correction in the hierarchical likelihood approach to the analysis of multivariate survival data.

Authors:  Jihyoun Jeon; Li Hsu; Malka Gorfine
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Robust best linear estimation for regression analysis using surrogate and instrumental variables.

Authors:  C Y Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Analysis of error-prone survival data under additive hazards models: measurement error effects and adjustments.

Authors:  Ying Yan; Grace Y Yi
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Hazard ratio estimation for biomarker-calibrated dietary exposures.

Authors:  Pamela A Shaw; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Proportional Hazards Model with Covariate Measurement Error and Instrumental Variables.

Authors:  Xiao Song; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Corrected score estimation in the proportional hazards model with misclassified discrete covariates.

Authors:  David M Zucker; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  ASSESSING SURROGATE ENDPOINTS IN VACCINE TRIALS WITH CASE-COHORT SAMPLING AND THE COX MODEL.

Authors:  Li Qin; Peter B Gilbert; Dean Follmann; Dongfeng Li
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Regression calibration in nutritional epidemiology: example of fat density and total energy in relationship to postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Cynthia A Thomson; Karen C Johnson; Jeannette Beasley; Garnet Anderson; James M Shikany; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marian L Neuhouser
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.