Literature DB >> 22285992

Robust best linear estimation for regression analysis using surrogate and instrumental variables.

C Y Wang1.   

Abstract

We investigate methods for regression analysis when covariates are measured with errors. In a subset of the whole cohort, a surrogate variable is available for the true unobserved exposure variable. The surrogate variable satisfies the classical measurement error model, but it may not have repeated measurements. In addition to the surrogate variables that are available among the subjects in the calibration sample, we assume that there is an instrumental variable (IV) that is available for all study subjects. An IV is correlated with the unobserved true exposure variable and hence can be useful in the estimation of the regression coefficients. We propose a robust best linear estimator that uses all the available data, which is the most efficient among a class of consistent estimators. The proposed estimator is shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal under very weak distributional assumptions. For Poisson or linear regression, the proposed estimator is consistent even if the measurement error from the surrogate or IV is heteroscedastic. Finite-sample performance of the proposed estimator is examined and compared with other estimators via intensive simulation studies. The proposed method and other methods are applied to a bladder cancer case-control study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285992      PMCID: PMC3413079          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  6 in total

1.  Logistic regression with exposure biomarkers and flexible measurement error.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sugar; Ching-Yun Wang; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.

Authors:  C Y Wang; Yijian Huang; Edward C Chao; Marjorie K Jeffcoat
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  An estimate of the magnitude of random errors in the DS86 dosimetry from data on chromosome aberrations and severe epilation.

Authors:  R Sposto; D O Stram; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Regression calibration in failure time regression.

Authors:  C Y Wang; L Hsu; Z D Feng; R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Stable chromosome aberrations among A-bomb survivors: an update.

Authors:  D O Stram; R Sposto; D Preston; S Abrahamson; T Honda; A A Awa
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Nutrient intake in relation to bladder cancer among middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  B Bruemmer; E White; T L Vaughan; C L Cheney
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total
  5 in total

1.  Measurement error models with interactions.

Authors:  Douglas Midthune; Raymond J Carroll; Laurence S Freedman; Victor Kipnis
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Expected estimating equation using calibration data for generalized linear models with a mixture of Berkson and classical errors in covariates.

Authors:  Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Shen-Ming Lee; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Joint nonparametric correction estimator for excess relative risk regression in survival analysis with exposure measurement error.

Authors:  Ching-Yun Wang; Harry Cullings; Xiao Song; Kenneth J Kopecky
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.488

4.  Cox regression with dependent error in covariates.

Authors:  Yijian Huang; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Simulation Extrapolation Method for Cox Regression Model with a Mixture of Berkson and Classical Errors in the Covariates using Calibration Data.

Authors:  Jean de Dieu Tapsoba; Edward C Chao; Ching-Yun Wang
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 1.829

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.