Literature DB >> 22088962

Bias correction in the hierarchical likelihood approach to the analysis of multivariate survival data.

Jihyoun Jeon1, Li Hsu, Malka Gorfine.   

Abstract

Frailty models are useful for measuring unobserved heterogeneity in risk of failures across clusters, providing cluster-specific risk prediction. In a frailty model, the latent frailties shared by members within a cluster are assumed to act multiplicatively on the hazard function. In order to obtain parameter and frailty variate estimates, we consider the hierarchical likelihood (H-likelihood) approach (Ha, Lee and Song, 2001. Hierarchical-likelihood approach for frailty models. Biometrika 88, 233-243) in which the latent frailties are treated as "parameters" and estimated jointly with other parameters of interest. We find that the H-likelihood estimators perform well when the censoring rate is low, however, they are substantially biased when the censoring rate is moderate to high. In this paper, we propose a simple and easy-to-implement bias correction method for the H-likelihood estimators under a shared frailty model. We also extend the method to a multivariate frailty model, which incorporates complex dependence structure within clusters. We conduct an extensive simulation study and show that the proposed approach performs very well for censoring rates as high as 80%. We also illustrate the method with a breast cancer data set. Since the H-likelihood is the same as the penalized likelihood function, the proposed bias correction method is also applicable to the penalized likelihood estimators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22088962      PMCID: PMC3577105          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxr040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  10 in total

1.  Maximum penalized likelihood estimation in a gamma-frailty model.

Authors:  Virginie Rondeau; Daniel Commenges; Pierre Joly
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Proportional hazards model with covariates subject to measurement error.

Authors:  T Nakamura
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Small sample bias in the gamma frailty model for univariate survival.

Authors:  Peter Barker; Robin Henderson
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Genetic mixed linear models for twin survival data.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Youngjo Lee; Yudi Pawitan
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  On robustness of marginal regression coefficient estimates and hazard functions in multivariate survival analysis of family data when the frailty distribution is mis-specified.

Authors:  Li Hsu; Malka Gorfine; Kathleen Malone
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Regression calibration in failure time regression.

Authors:  C Y Wang; L Hsu; Z D Feng; R L Prentice
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Frailty modelling for survival data from multi-centre clinical trials.

Authors:  Il Do Ha; Richard Sylvester; Catherine Legrand; Gilbert Mackenzie
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  CASE-CONTROL SURVIVAL ANALYSIS WITH A GENERAL SEMIPARAMETRIC SHARED FRAILTY MODEL - A PSEUDO FULL LIKELIHOOD APPROACH.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; David M Zucker; Li Hsu
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.028

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.