Literature DB >> 18338098

Effect of soft shell hip protectors on pressure distribution to the hip during sideways falls.

A C Laing1, S N Robinovitch.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While hip protectors represent a promising strategy for preventing hip fractures, clinical efficacy has been limited by poor user compliance. Soft shell protectors may be more acceptable to users than traditional hard shell designs. However, before embarking on clinical trials to assess efficacy, laboratory experiments are required to determine how soft shell protectors affect the force applied during impact to the hip. This was the goal of the current study.
METHODS: Fifteen women participated in "pelvis release experiments," which safely simulate the impact stage of a sideways fall. During the trials, we measured total impact force and mean pressure over the greater trochanter with the participant unpadded, and while wearing two commercially available soft shell protectors.
RESULTS: Mean pressure over the greater trochanter was reduced by 76% by a 14-mm thick horseshoe-shaped protector and by 73% by a 16-mm thick continuous protector. Total force was reduced by 9% by the horseshoe and by 19% by the continuous protector.
CONCLUSIONS: Soft shell hip protectors substantially reduce the pressure over the greater trochanter, while only modestly reducing total impact force during simulated sideways falls. These data support the need for clinical trials to determine whether soft shell protectors reduce hip fracture risk in vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18338098     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0571-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  28 in total

1.  Risk factors for falls as a cause of hip fracture in women. The Northeast Hip Fracture Study Group.

Authors:  J A Grisso; J L Kelsey; B L Strom; G Y Chiu; G Maislin; L A O'Brien; S Hoffman; F Kaplan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Anatomical hip model for the mechanical testing of hip protectors.

Authors:  Siegfried Derler; A B Spierings; K-U Schmitt
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength.

Authors:  S L Manske; T Liu-Ambrose; P M de Bakker; D Liu; S Kontulainen; P Guy; T R Oxland; H A McKay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Comparison of force attenuation properties of four different hip protectors under simulated falling conditions in the elderly: an in vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; J Poutala
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Hip fracture prevention trial using hip protectors in Japanese nursing homes.

Authors:  A Harada; M Mizuno; M Takemura; H Tokuda; H Okuizumi; N Niino
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Distribution of contact force during impact to the hip.

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; W C Hayes; T A McMahon
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  An analysis of the effect of lower extremity strength on impact severity during a backward fall.

Authors:  R Sandler; S Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry.

Authors:  X G Cheng; G Lowet; S Boonen; P H Nicholson; P Brys; J Nijs; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Reducing hip fracture risk during sideways falls: evidence in young adults of the protective effects of impact to the hands and stepping.

Authors:  Fabio Feldman; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24
View more
  15 in total

1.  Transmission of force in the lumbosacral spine during backward falls.

Authors:  Carolyn Van Toen; Meena M Sran; Stephen N Robinovitch; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The effects of pad geometry and material properties on the biomechanical effectiveness of 26 commercially available hip protectors.

Authors:  Andrew C Laing; Fabio Feldman; Mona Jalili; Chun Ming Jimmy Tsai; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.

Authors:  S A Yahaya; Z M Ripin; M I Z Ridzwan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Biomechanical testing of hip protectors following the Canadian Standards Association express document.

Authors:  B E Keenan; S L Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Increasing adherence with the use of hip protectors for older people living in the community.

Authors:  I D Cameron; S Kurrle; S Quine; P Sambrook; L March; D Chan; J Stocks; K Lockwood; B Cook; F G Schaafsma
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Management of osteoporosis among home health and long-term care patients with a prior fracture.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Kenneth G Saag; Sarah D Berry; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Kellie L Flood; Kenneth W Lyles; S Bobo Tanner; Nelson B Watts; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 8.  Hip protectors are cost-effective in the prevention of hip fractures in patients with high fracture risk.

Authors:  R T A L de Bot; H D Veldman; A M Witlox; L W van Rhijn; M Hiligsmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  The dynamics of electric powered wheelchair sideways tips and falls: experimental and computational analysis of impact forces and injury.

Authors:  Brett Erickson; Masih A Hosseini; Parry Singh Mudhar; Maryam Soleimani; Arina Aboonabi; Siamak Arzanpour; Carolyn J Sparrey
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.