Literature DB >> 17479205

Impact of preoperative physiological risk profile on postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency operation of complicated peptic ulcer disease.

Jan-Hendrik Egberts1, Birte Summa, Ulrike Schulz, Clemens Schafmayer, Sebastian Hinz, Juergen Tepel.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the preoperative physiological risk profile for postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency treatment of complicated peptic ulcer disease (PUD).
METHODS: Operative notes and hospital files of 261 patients--111 female, 150 male; median age 67 years (range 17-100 years)--undergoing an emergency operation from 1993 to 2005 were analyzed retrospectively. The physiologic subscore of the POSSUM score (POSSUM-phys) was analyzed with regard to predicting postoperative complications. Follow-up was obtained from questionnaires sent to family practitioners or by patient interviews.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 44%, and mortality was 24%. Among risk factors studied (e.g., sex, patient's age, duration of symptoms, type of surgery), a high POSSUM-phys score was the strongest predictor for postoperative sepsis, anastomotic/suture dehiscence, postoperative bleeding, and mortality. Cut points for patients at risk could be calculated. Surgical procedures (organ-preserving versus resection) had no influence when matched for POSSUM-phys score. Nevertheless, organ resections were associated with higher scores. Recurrent PUD was a rare event (7.6%).
CONCLUSION: The preoperative physiologic POSSUM score is a promising instrument for identifying patients at increased risk to develop major postoperative complications after emergency surgery for complicated PUD. Prospective studies are needed to prove its applicability for adjusting treatment to individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17479205     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9061-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  29 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for peptic ulcer today. A study on the incidence, methods and mortality in surgery for peptic ulcer in Finland between 1987 and 1999.

Authors:  H Paimela; N K J Oksala; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  ASA status and age predict adverse events after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  J C Hall; J L Hall
Journal:  J Qual Clin Pract       Date:  1996-06

3.  Perforated peptic ulcer: long-term results after simple closure in the elderly.

Authors:  L G Blomgren
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Annmarie Lassen; Jesper Hallas; Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age.

Authors:  K Tsugawa; N Koyanagi; M Hashizume; M Tomikawa; K Akahoshi; K Ayukawa; H Wada; K Tanoue; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Risk scoring in surgical patients.

Authors:  H J Jones; L de Cossart
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 7.  Surgical perspectives in peptic ulcer disease and gastritis.

Authors:  Tamar Lipof; David Shapiro; Robert-A Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Morbidity, ability to swallow, and survival, after oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus and cardia.

Authors:  K Svanes; L Stangeland; A Viste; J E Varhaug; J E Grønbech; O Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1995-09

9.  Factors that predict morbidity and mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Jyrki T Mäkelä; Heikki Kiviniemi; Pasi Ohtonen; Seppo O Laitinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2002

10.  Current practice of emergency vagotomy and Helicobacter pylori eradication for complicated peptic ulcer in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  A D Gilliam; W J Speake; D N Lobo; I J Beckingham
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  Risk evaluation in cutaneous melanoma patients undergoing lymph node dissection: impact of POSSUM.

Authors:  F Egberts; C Hartje; C Schafmayer; K C Kaehler; W von Schönfels; A Hauschild; T Becker; J H Egberts
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Preoperative risk evaluation of postoperative morbidity in IBD patients--impact of the POSSUM score.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; Antje Stroeh; Ibrahim Alkatout; Freya A Goumas; Phillipp A Brand; Clemens Schafmayer; Thomas Becker; Bodo Schniewind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical management of peptic ulcer complications in the era of proton pump inhibitors.

Authors:  Rabea Hasadia; Yael Kopelman; Oded Olsha; Ricardo Alfici; Itamar Ashkenazi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.