Literature DB >> 9122770

Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

J N Katz1, S J Lipson, L C Chang, S A Levine, A H Fossel, M H Liang.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review and prospective follow-up of 88 patients who had decompressive laminectomy with or without fusion from 1983 to 1986.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the 7- to 10-year outcome of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited information on the impact of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis on symptoms, walking ability, and satisfaction, as well as reoperation.
METHODS: Patients completed standardized questionnaires in 1993 that included items about reoperations, back pain, leg pain, walking capacity, and satisfaction with surgery. Associations between preoperative demographic and clinical variables and outcomes 7 to 10 years after surgery were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: Average preoperative age was 69 years and eight patients received fusion. Of 88 patients in the original cohort, 20 (23%) were deceased and 20 (23%) had undergone reoperation by 7- to 10-year follow-up. Fifty-five patients answered questionnaires. Average duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. Thirty-three percent of the respondents had severe back pain at follow-up, 53% were unable to walk two blocks, and 75% were satisfied with the results of surgery. The severity of current spine-related symptoms was a stronger correlate of physical functional status at the time of follow-up than age or nonspinal comorbid conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Seven to 10 years after decompressive surgery for spinal stenosis, 23% of patients had undergone reoperation and 33% of respondents had severe back pain. Despite a high prevalence of nonspinal problems in this elderly cohort, spinal symptoms were the most important correlate of reduced functional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9122770     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  58 in total

1.  Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Sung-Joo Ryu; In-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-05-31

Review 2.  The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Lumbar spine fusion surgery and stroke: a national cohort study.

Authors:  Jau-Ching Wu; Yu-Chun Chen; Laura Liu; Wen-Cheng Huang; Peck-Foong Thien; Tzeng-Ji Chen; Henrich Cheng; Su-Shun Lo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Expansive lumbar laminoplasty for degenerative spinal stenosis in patients below 70 years of age.

Authors:  H Matsui; M Kanamori; H Ishihara; N Hirano; H Tsuji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal stenosis re-operation rate in Sweden is 11% at 10 years--a national analysis of 9,664 operations.

Authors:  Karl-Ake Jansson; Gunnar Németh; F Granath; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Insertion loads of the X STOP interspinous process distraction system designed to treat neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Vikram Talwar; Derek P Lindsey; Amy Fredrick; Ken Y Hsu; James F Zucherman; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long-term outcome of decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Shay Shabat; Zeev Arinzon; Yoram Folman; Josef Leitner; Rami David; Evgeny Pevzner; Reuven Gepstein; Ilya Pekarsky; Ishay Shuval
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results.

Authors:  J F Zucherman; K Y Hsu; C A Hartjen; T F Mehalic; D A Implicito; M J Martin; D R Johnson; G A Skidmore; P P Vessa; J W Dwyer; S Puccio; J C Cauthen; R M Ozuna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Reliability of the clinical examination in the diagnosis of neurogenic versus vascular claudication.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Paul Park; Peter K Henke; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Juan Valdivia; Sierra Loar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Long-term health care utilisation and costs after spinal fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Cody Bünger; Rikke Søgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.