Literature DB >> 20539792

Interspinous implant with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Sung-Joo Ryu1, In-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the safety and efficacy of one level unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression (ULBD) with the placement of a device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) compared with one level ULBD only in elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).
METHODS: A non randomized prospective analysis was performed on 16 patients who underwent one level ULBD with DIAM (Group A) and 20 patients with one level ULBD only (Group B) between February 2007 and March 2008. Radiographic imaging, visual analog scale (VAS) and MacNab outcome scale were obtained before and after surgery at a mean interval of 21 months (range 17-27 months).
RESULTS: The disc height, interpedicular distance, slip distance and segmental lordotic angle were similar between two groups. In the group A, there was no significant difference between the pre- and post-operative imaging in terms of the sagittal balance and disc height. Both groups showed significant improvement in the clinical outcomes. In addition, there was significantly less low-back pain in the group A than in the group B at the last follow up, while the clinical improvement of the leg pain and MacNab outcome scale showed no significant difference in the two groups. There were no major complications or DIAM associated complications.
CONCLUSION: ULBD with DIAM is a safe and efficacious treatment for selective elderly patients with DLSS, particularly for relieving low back pain comparing to ULBD. ULBD with DIAM did not alter the disc height or sagittal alignment at the mean 21 months follow-up interval.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intervertebral assisted motion; Laminotomy; Low-back pain; Spinal stenosis

Year:  2010        PMID: 20539792      PMCID: PMC2883053          DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2010.47.5.338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc        ISSN: 1225-8245


  27 in total

1.  Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery: a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases.

Authors:  S Caserta; G A La Maida; B Misaggi; D Peroni; R Pietrabissa; M T Raimondi; A Redaelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Tor D Tosteson; Jon D Lurie; Anna N A Tosteson; Emily Blood; Brett Hanscom; Harry Herkowitz; Frank Cammisa; Todd Albert; Scott D Boden; Alan Hilibrand; Harley Goldberg; Sigurd Berven; Howard An
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski; Stuart A Callary; Christopher J Colloca; Victor Kosmopoulos; Deed Harrison; Robert J Moore
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis by different methods].

Authors:  Wei-xing Xu; Jian Wang; Di Lu; Zhen Wu; Wei-min Zhu; Chun Zhang
Journal:  Zhongguo Gu Shang       Date:  2009-10

5.  Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis; Spyros Zacharatos; Andreas Zafiropoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Marco Sassi; Andrea Cardia; Alessandro Ortolina; Antonio De Santis; Giovanni Luccarell; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-12

Review 7.  Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Steven D Glassman; Jennifer Howard
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Pathomechanism of loss of elasticity and hypertrophy of lumbar ligamentum flavum in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Hirofumi Kosaka; Koichi Sairyo; Ashok Biyani; Douglas Leaman; Richard Yeasting; Kosaku Higashino; Toshinori Sakai; Shinsuke Katoh; Toshiaki Sano; Vijay K Goel; Natsuo Yasui
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  K Anthony Kim; Matthew McDonald; Justin H T Pik; Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

10.  Device for intervertebral assisted motion: technique and initial results.

Authors:  Jean Taylor; Patrick Pupin; Stephane Delajoux; Sylvain Palmer
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Interspinous implant "InSWing®" for the lumbar spine].

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The cost effectiveness of dynamic and static interspinous spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis compared with laminectomy.

Authors:  Mohsen Yaghoubi; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Mohammad Moradi-Joo; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Neda Zamani; Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-03-06

4.  Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yijian Zhang; Dongdong Lu; Wei Ji; Fan He; Angela Carley Chen; Huilin Yang; Xuesong Zhu
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Weimin Huang; Zhengqi Chang; Jingtao Zhang; Ruoxian Song; Xiuchun Yu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.