Literature DB >> 9119866

Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.

R P Katz1, J J Callaghan, P M Sullivan, R C Johnston.   

Abstract

We performed 83 consecutive cemented revision total hip arthroplasties in 77 patients between 1977 and 1983 using improved cementing techniques. One patient (two hips) was lost to follow-up. The remaining 76 patients (81 hips) had an average age at revision of 63.7 years (23 to 89). At the final follow-up 18 hips (22%) had had a reoperation, two (2.5%) for sepsis, three (4%) for dislocation and 13 (16%) for aseptic loosening. The incidence of rerevision for aseptic femoral loosening was 5.4% and for aseptic acetabular loosening 16%. These results confirm that cemented femoral revision is a durable option in revision hip surgery when improved cementing techniques are used, but that cemented acetabular revision is unsatisfactory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9119866     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b2.7245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  17 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Does intraoperative tissue sample enrichment help or hinder the identification of microorganisms in prosthetic joint infection?

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Adnan Saithna; Nicholas Smith; Rory Norris; Andrew Sprowson; Pedro Foguet
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-11-22

4.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What Can We Learn From 20-year Followup Studies of Hip Replacement?

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; John J Callaghan; Yubo Gao; Andrew J Pugely; Steve S Liu; Lucian C Warth; Devon D Goetz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  L Gaiani; R Bertelli; Massimo Palmonari; G Vicenzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29

7.  Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical biomechanics of wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Douglas R Pedersen; Richard C Johnston; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2003

9.  High medium-term survival of Zweymüller SLR-plus stem used in femoral revision.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Effects of hydroxyapatite coating of cups used in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stergios Lazarinis; Johan Kärrholm; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.