Literature DB >> 14575243

Clinical biomechanics of wear in total hip arthroplasty.

John J Callaghan1, Douglas R Pedersen, Richard C Johnston, Thomas D Brown.   

Abstract

Complementary clinical and laboratory studies were performed to identify variables associated with polyethylene wear following total hip replacement, and to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for accelerated wear in the total hip arthroplasty construct. Observational cohort studies were performed using a prospective clinical database of more than 4000 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon, to identify wear-related variables. These variables included head size, acetabular/femoral component impingement, and third body debris. Novel digital edge detection techniques were developed and employed to accurately measure wear, and to determine the relationships of head size and third body debris to acceleration of wear. A novel sliding-distance-coupled finite element model was formulated and employed to examine the mechanisms responsible for wear. The long-term cohort studies demonstrated smaller head sizes to be associated with less wear. Third body debris generated from cable fretting was associated with an increase in wear, osteolysis, and acetabular loosening, especially with larger head sizes. The sliding-distance-coupled finite element model replicated the wear rates occurring in vitro and in vivo, demonstrating the importance of sliding distance on polyethylene wear following total hip arthroplasty. It also demonstrated substantial increases in wear associated with femoral head scratching from third body debris. Further extension of the finite element formulation demonstrated the potential for acetabular component rim damage from impingement wear, and the enhanced potential for third body ingress to the bearing surface with larger head sizes. Edge detection wear measurement techniques demonstrated that early wear rates were predictive of long-term wear rates. These complementary clinical and laboratory investigations have provided insight into 1) the significance of sliding distance and physiologic loci of motion as contributing factors in minimizing wear, 2) the deleterious effects of third body particulates in accelerating wear, 3) the potential for, and factors related to, impingement wear, and 4) the potential advantages and compromises related to the use of larger head sizes in the bearing surface construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14575243      PMCID: PMC1888402     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  49 in total

1.  The spatial location of impingement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Yamaguchi; T Akisue; T W Bauer; Y Hashimoto
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Prevention of dislocation after hip arthroplasty: lessons from long-term followup.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; B E Heithoff; D D Goetz; P M Sullivan; D R Pedersen; R C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Rate of wear in total hip replacement.

Authors:  J Charnley; D K Halley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation.

Authors:  C F Scifert; T D Brown; D R Pedersen; J J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The John Charnley Award. Practice surveillance: a practical method to assess outcome and to perform clinical research.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; R C Johnston; D R Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Finite element analysis of a novel design approach to resisting total hip dislocation.

Authors:  C F Scifert; T D Brown; J D Lipman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  The effects of walking velocity and age on hip kinematics and kinetics.

Authors:  R D Crowinshield; R A Brand; R C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip.

Authors:  R D Crowninshield; R C Johnston; J G Andrews; R A Brand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement. Minimum twenty-five-year follow-up.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; J C Albright; D D Goetz; J P Olejniczak; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Prediction of long-term polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty, based on early wear measurements made using digital image analysis.

Authors:  D R Pedersen; T D Brown; S L Hillis; J J Callaghan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  2 in total

1.  MyHip: supporting planning and surgical guidance for a better total hip arthroplasty : A pilot study.

Authors:  Jérôme Schmid; Christophe Chênes; Sylvain Chagué; Pierre Hoffmeyer; Panayiotis Christofilopoulos; Massimiliano Bernardoni; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Metallosis following full thickness wear in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicholas Birkett; Ibraheim El-Daly; Hajir Ibraheim; Chima Mbubaegbu
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.