Literature DB >> 25416208

Does intraoperative tissue sample enrichment help or hinder the identification of microorganisms in prosthetic joint infection?

Robert W Jordan1, Adnan Saithna, Nicholas Smith, Rory Norris, Andrew Sprowson, Pedro Foguet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Biofilm formation reduces the efficacy of standard microbiological techniques in prosthetic joint infection. This study aimed to investigate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of tissue sample enrichment as a means to increase diagnostic yield.
METHODS: Patients undergoing revision arthroplasty surgery between May 2004 and January 2013 had intraoperative tissue samples cultured in standard media as well as enriched in brain heart infusion broth. Patients were separated into infected or non-infected groups according to modified criteria from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society.
RESULTS: A total of 197 revision arthroplasties were included (non-infected, n = 165; proven infection, n = 32). The mean time until revision in non-infected and infected groups was 75.9 and 41.7 months, respectively. The commonest microorganisms cultured were coagulase-negative staphylococci (42.9 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (34.4 %). The sensitivity and specificity of standard tissue culture were 0.25 (CI 0.18-0.33) and 0.98 (CI 0.95-0.99), respectively. Including enrichment culture results increased the sensitivity to 0.45 (CI 0.37-0.54), but decreased specificity to 0.59 (CI 0.52-0.66).
CONCLUSION: Any potential increase in the sensitivity is far outweighed by the extremely high false-positive rate. Results of tissue samples cultured by enrichment should be used with caution and may lead to a worse outcome if incorrectly interpreted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416208     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1564-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  22 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing culture methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a summary of modifications and improvements reported since 1995.

Authors:  Lone Heimann Larsen; Jeppe Lange; Yijuan Xu; Henrik C Schønheyder
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus bottle compared with conventional media for the detection of bacteria in tissue samples from orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Aurélie Velay; Frédéric Schramm; Jeannot Gaudias; Benoît Jaulhac; Philippe Riegel
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Enrichment methodology to increase the positivity of cultures from body fluids.

Authors:  Alessandra Valle Daur; Francisco Klimak; Laura Lúcia Cogo; Gislene Diógenes Botão; Cristina Leise Bastos Monteiro; Libera Maria Dalla Costa
Journal:  Braz J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.949

4.  Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  B L Atkins; N Athanasou; J J Deeks; D W Crook; H Simpson; T E Peto; P McLardy-Smith; A R Berendt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Bauer; Javad Parvizi; Naomi Kobayashi; Viktor Krebs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.

Authors:  R P Katz; J J Callaghan; P M Sullivan; R C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

7.  Incidence of prosthetic joint infections after primary knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Esa Jämsen; Markku Varonen; Heini Huhtala; Matti U K Lehto; Jukka Lumio; Yrjö T Konttinen; Teemu Moilanen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S J Nickinson; T N Board; A K Gambhir; M L Porter; P R Kay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Periprosthetic joint infection: the incidence, timing, and predisposing factors.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Elie Ghanem; Ashish Joshi; James J Purtill; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Elie F Berbari; Camelia Marculescu; Irene Sia; Brian D Lahr; Arlen D Hanssen; James M Steckelberg; Rachel Gullerud; Douglas R Osmon
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.