Literature DB >> 9118051

Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.

R E Schwarz1, J S Groeger, D G Coit.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long term intravenous access is a common requirement for cancer patients. This analysis was designed to determine device-related morbidity and factors predictive of poor long term outcome for patients with subcutaneous single lumen intravenous access ports.
METHODS: Six hundred eighty patients who underwent subcutaneous intravenous port placement between June 1987 and May 1989 at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center were followed prospectively until port removal, death, or a maximum of 1960 days. Indications for and circumstances of placement, patient diagnoses, patient demographics, and subsequent courses of treatment were recorded, as well as technical and microbiologic device-related complications. Total, device specific, and complication free device durations were calculated.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 52.4 years (range, 1.6-83.9 years). The female-to-male ratio was 1.5 to 1. Cancer diagnoses included solid organ tumors (84%), leukemia (4%), lymphoma (11%), and others (1%). Indications included access for systemic chemotherapy (98%), total parenteral nutrition (0.5%), and others (1.5%). One insertion complication and six insertion failures occurred, without mortality. The estimated mean overall actuarial device specific duration was 1191 days (range, 2-1960 days). Actuarial mean complication free, device specific duration was 952 days. Complications included sepsis (n = 31; 4.4%), site infection (n = 31; 4.4%), and accessibility failures such as thrombosis and leakage (n = 40, 5.7%). Reasons for end of port duration were patient death (72.4%), end of treatment (13.5%), functional failure or intractable infection (11.2%), and others (2.9%). Independent factors correlating with decreased port specific, complication free duration included placement site, age, tumor type, and catheter tip position.
CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous intravenous access ports in cancer patients are safe and well tolerated. Long term device duration is primarily influenced by patient survival. In this study, 90% of patients alive at 1 year and 70% of patients alive at 4 years had a functional port.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9118051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  23 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided vein puncture versus surgical cut-down technique in totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADS): a prospective comparative study on safety, efficacy andcomplications.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cavallaro; Alessandro Sanguinetti; Olga Iorio; Giuseppe D'Ermo; Andrea Polistena; Nicola Avenia; Gianfranco Silecchia; Giorgio De Toma
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

2.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  [How should urologists perform implantation of subcutaneous central venous port systems? A single center experience of 347 cases].

Authors:  M Schenck; W Michels-Oswald; S Tschirdewahn; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp; A Rose; A Panic; C Niedworok; R Rossi
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Femoral Placement of Totally Implantable Venous Access Ports in Patients with Bilateral Breast Cancer.

Authors:  V Almasi-Sperling; S Hieber; J Lermann; O Strahl; M W Beckmann; W Lang; T A Sagban
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Administration of chemotherapy via the median cubital vein without implantable central venous access ports: port-free chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yoshida; Seiichiro Hoshino; Naoya Aisu; Masayasu Naito; Syu Tanimura; Ai Mogi; Toshihiro Tanaka; Keiji Hirata; Kazuo Tamura; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Central venous access: techniques and indications in oncology.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Marcy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  A single institution observational study of early mechanical complications in central venous catheters (valved and open-ended) in children with cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fratino; Elio Castagnola; Claudio Carlini; Cinzia Mazzola; Vincenzo Jasonni; Angelo Claudio Molinari; Riccardo Haupt
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Skin and soft tissue infections in hospitalized and critically ill patients: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Hsiu-Nien Shen; Chin-Li Lu
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Complete caval thrombosis secondary to an implanted venous port--a case study.

Authors:  Jens Hasskarl; Stefan Köberich; Alex Frydrychowicz; Gerald Illerhaus; Cornelius F Waller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 10.  Long-term outcome of radiological-guided insertion of implanted central venous access port devices (CVAPD) for the delivery of chemotherapy in cancer patients: institutional experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  J Vardy; K Engelhardt; K Cox; J Jacquet; A McDade; M Boyer; P Beale; M Stockler; R Loneragan; B Dennien; R Waugh; S J Clarke
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.