Literature DB >> 15449084

A single institution observational study of early mechanical complications in central venous catheters (valved and open-ended) in children with cancer.

Giuseppe Fratino1, Elio Castagnola, Claudio Carlini, Cinzia Mazzola, Vincenzo Jasonni, Angelo Claudio Molinari, Riccardo Haupt.   

Abstract

The use of indwelling central venous catheters (CVCs) has become essential for managing children undergoing cancer treatment. Various types of CVCs are available, but reports on complications observed in pediatric series are scarce. We describe our experience concerning early mechanical complications at our institute by providing a prospective evaluation of three types of CVCs that were inserted over a 39-month period. Between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2003, double-lumen (DL) or single-lumen (SL) Hickman-Broviac (HB) and single-lumen pressure-activated safety-valved (PASV) catheters were inserted and prospectively evaluated. Five groups of possible mechanical complications were defined a priori: dislodgement, migration, rupture, accidental removal, and blockage. We took into consideration complications occurring only within the first 30 days of insertion. A total of 272 CVCs (118 PASV, 57 DL-HB, and 97 SL-HB) were inserted in 232 children. A total of 29 early mechanical complications (10.7% of all CVCs) were diagnosed: 15.2% of the PASV, 10.5% of the DL-HB, and 4.1% of the SL-HB. Elective removal of the catheter due to complications was required in eight patients. SL-HB catheters had fewer complications, while the complication rate and the number of devices that were removed were significantly higher in patients with PASV catheters. We conclude that catheter type correlates with the risk of early mechanical complications and removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15449084     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-004-1279-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  15 in total

1.  Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  L A Mermel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-07       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Routine chest X-rays after insertion of implantable long-term venous catheters: necessary or not?

Authors:  A A Guth
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.688

3.  A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  B W Warner; M M Haygood; S L Davies; G A Hennies
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Mechanical and infective central venous catheter-related complications: a prospective non-randomized study using Hickman and Groshong catheters in children with hematological malignancies.

Authors:  E Biagi; C Arrigo; M G Dell'Orto; A Balduzzi; C Pezzini; A Rovelli; G Masera; D Silvestri; C Uderzo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Thromboembolic complications related to indwelling central venous catheters in children with oncological/haematological diseases: a retrospective study of 362 catheters.

Authors:  A C Molinari; E Castagnola; C Mazzola; M Piacentino; G Fratino
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Major long-term complications in 1,422 permanent venous access devices.

Authors:  J Sariego; B Bootorabi; T Matsumoto; M Kerstein
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Short-term complications of central line placement in children with the human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  E R Island; J A Church; D B Shaul
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  The CCSG prospective study of venous access devices: an analysis of insertions and causes for removal.

Authors:  E S Wiener; P McGuire; C J Stolar; R H Rich; V C Albo; A R Ablin; D L Betcher; A L Sitarz; J D Buckley; M D Krailo
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  R E Schwarz; J S Groeger; D G Coit
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  [Early and late complications after implantation of central venous catheters].

Authors:  A Herold; K Rothe; T Woller; U Bierbach; J Bennek
Journal:  Klin Padiatr       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.349

View more
  3 in total

1.  Incidence of indwelling central venous catheter-related complications using the Sri Paran technique for device fixation in children with cancer.

Authors:  G Fratino; S Avanzini; A C Molinari; P Buffa; E Castagnola; R Haupt
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Shifting from open surgical cut down to ultrasound-guided percutaneous central venous catheterization in children: learning curve and related complications.

Authors:  S Avanzini; E Guida; M Conte; F Faranda; P Buffa; C Granata; E Castagnola; G Fratino; L Mameli; A Michelazzi; A Pini-Prato; G Mattioli; A C Molinari; E Lanino; V Jasonni
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Factors affecting mechanical complications of central venous access devices in children.

Authors:  Jessica J Zhang; Ramesh M Nataraja; Amiria Lynch; Richard Barnes; Peter Ferguson; Maurizio Pacilli
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.