Literature DB >> 9111392

Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington.

H J Kreder1, R A Deyo, T Koepsell, M F Swiontkowski, W Kreuter.   

Abstract

Since the late 1970's, an empirical relationship between the volume of procedures performed by a provider (a hospital or surgeon) and the outcome has been documented for various operations. The present study examines the relationship between the volume of hip replacements performed by surgeons and hospitals and the postoperative rate of complications. A statewide hospital discharge registry was used to identify patients who had had an elective hip replacement between 1988 and 1991. Patients who had had a revision procedure, who had been referred on an emergency basis, or who had had a diagnosis of a fracture or a malignant tumor on admission were excluded. There were 7936 eligible patients who had had 8774 hip replacements. The average annual number of all hip replacements performed from 1987 through 1991 was subsequently determined for each hospital and surgeon who had cared for at least one patient in the study cohort. The rate of operative complications was modeled as a function of the volume of procedures performed by the surgeon or hospital (the surgeon or hospital volume), with adjustment for the age of the patient, gender, co-morbidity, and operative diagnosis. We noted significant differences in the case mix of low-volume providers compared with that of high-volume providers (p < 0.01). In general, surgeons and hospitals with a volume below the fortieth percentile managed patients who had a more adverse risk profile in terms of age, co-morbidity, and diagnosis. Even after adjustment for the case mix, there was a significant relationship between surgeons who averaged fewer than two hip replacements annually (low-volume surgeons) and a worse outcome (p < 0.05). Patients managed by these low-volume surgeons tended to have higher mortality rates, more infections, higher rates of revision operations, and more serious complications during the index hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization was inversely related to surgeon volume and directly associated with hospital volume. Hospital charges were inversely related to hospital volume, even after adjustment for patient-related factors as well as the duration of hospitalization, the year of the operation, and the destination after discharge (p < 0.05). More detailed information is required to investigate the reason for these observed variations in the rates of complications. If future studies confirm an association between low-volume providers and an adverse outcome, performance of some types of elective total hip replacements at regional centers should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9111392     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199704000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  36 in total

1.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  A S Rosemurgy; M Bloomston; F M Serafini; B Coon; M M Murr; L C Carey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Does delivery volume of family physicians predict maternal and newborn outcome?

Authors:  Michael C Klein; Andrea Spence; Janusz Kaczorowski; Ann Kelly; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-05-14       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Revision hip arthroplasty activity in a single UK health region: an audit of 1265 cases.

Authors:  T Hassan; S Birtwistle; R A Power; W M Harper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Choice of hospital for revision total hip replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; John Wright; Kelly L Corbett; Henrik Malchau; John A Baron; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Provider volumes and early outcomes of primary total joint replacement in Ontario.

Authors:  J Michael Paterson; J Ivan Williams; Hans J Kreder; Nizar N Mahomed; Nadia Gunraj; Xuesong Wang; Andreas Laupacis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Cost-effectiveness of referrals to high-volume hospitals: an analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model for hip fracture surgeries.

Authors:  Afschin Gandjour; Eva-Julia Weyler
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2006-11

7.  Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications.

Authors:  Carl Wierks; Richard L Skolasky; Jong Hun Ji; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The trends in treatment of femoral neck fractures in the Medicare population from 1991 to 2008.

Authors:  Benjamin J Miller; Xin Lu; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Patient characteristics affecting the prognosis of total hip and knee joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pasqualina L Santaguida; Gillian A Hawker; Pamela L Hudak; Richard Glazier; Nizar N Mahomed; Hans J Kreder; Peter C Coyte; James G Wright
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.