Literature DB >> 11309644

Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

A S Rosemurgy1, M Bloomston, F M Serafini, B Coon, M M Murr, L C Carey.   

Abstract

Others have suggested that in certain technically challenging operations, outcome and experience are related. Because pancreaticoduodenectomy is a technically complex procedure, this study was undertaken to evaluate mortality, length of hospital stay, and hospital charges when compared to volume of experience. The database of the State of Florida Agency for Health Care Administration was queried for pancreaticoduodenectomies undertaken during a recent 33-month period. Length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality were stratified by the frequency of pancreaticoduodenectomy. A total of 282 surgeons performed 698 pancreaticoduodenectomies over 33 months. Eighty-nine percent of surgeons performed one pancreaticoduodenectomy per year or less and accounted for 52% of the procedures. Overall mortality rate was 5.1%. Average hospital charges were $72,171.64. The more frequently pancreaticoduodenectomy was undertaken, the shorter the hospital stay (P = 0.025, regression analysis) and the lower the hospital charges (P = 0.008, regression analysis) and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.036, log likelihood ratio test). Surgeons who undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy more frequently have patients with shorter hospital stays, lower hospital charges, and lower in-hospital mortality rates, independent of hospital volume. Variations exist among surgeons and among different areas of the state. Data regarding cost and mortality are available for use in programs of cost and quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11309644     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)80009-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  17 in total

1.  The effects of regionalization on cost and outcome for one general high-risk surgical procedure.

Authors:  T A Gordon; G P Burleyson; J M Tielsch; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Should hepatic resections be performed at high-volume referral centers?

Authors:  M A Choti; H M Bowman; H A Pitt; J A Sosa; J V Sitzmann; J L Cameron; T A Gordon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  The Whipple procedure in the 1990s.

Authors:  C J Yeo
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  1999

4.  Importance of designated thoracic trauma surgeons in the management of traumatic aortic transection.

Authors:  M H Albrink; E Rodriguez; G J England; P P McKeown; J M Hurst; A S Rosemurgy
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington.

Authors:  H J Kreder; R A Deyo; T Koepsell; M F Swiontkowski; W Kreuter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Relationship between provider volume and mortality for carotid endarterectomies in New York state.

Authors:  E L Hannan; A J Popp; B Tranmer; P Fuestel; J Waldman; D Shah
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; J A Showstack; P P Katz; C U Corvera; R S Warren; S J Mulvihill
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-01

9.  Relation of perioperative deaths to hospital volume among patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy.

Authors:  M D Lieberman; H Kilburn; M Lindsey; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A hospital's annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate.

Authors:  M G Patti; C U Corvera; R E Glasgow; L W Way
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  30 in total

1.  Pancreatoduodenectomy with or without early ligation of the inferior pancreatoduodenal artery: comparison of intraoperative blood loss and short-term outcome.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishizaki; Hiroyuki Sugo; Jiro Yoshimoto; Hiroshi Imamura; Seiji Kawasaki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Margaret A Tempero; J Pablo Arnoletti; Stephen Behrman; Edgar Ben-Josef; Al B Benson; Jordan D Berlin; John L Cameron; Ephraim S Casper; Steven J Cohen; Michelle Duff; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; William G Hawkins; John P Hoffman; Boris W Kuvshinoff; Mokenge P Malafa; Peter Muscarella; Eric K Nakakura; Aaron R Sasson; Sarah P Thayer; Douglas S Tyler; Robert S Warren; Samuel Whiting; Christopher Willett; Robert A Wolff
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Florida: do 20-year trends document the salutary benefits of centralization of care?

Authors:  Carrie E Ryan; Thomas W Wood; Sharona B Ross; Amanda E Smart; Prashant B Sukharamwala; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Hospital readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dawn M Emick; Taylor S Riall; John L Cameron; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Joann Coleman; Patricia K Sauter; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pancreatic cancer in the general population: Improvements in survival over the last decade.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Dong Zhang; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy continues to determine length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Alexander Rosemurgy; Sarah Cowgill; Brian Coe; Ashley Thomas; Sam Al-Saadi; Steven Goldin; Emmanuel Zervos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Targeting early deaths following pancreaticoduodenectomy to improve survival.

Authors:  Whalen Clark; Melissa Silva; Natalie Donn; Kenneth Luberice; Leigh Ann Humphries; Harold Paul; Jonathan Hernandez; Sharona B Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francisco Igor B Macedo; Prakash Jayanthi; Mia Mowzoon; Danny Yakoub; Vikas Dudeja; Nipun Merchant
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Impact of surgical experience on management and outcome of pancreatic surgery performed in high- and low-volume centers.

Authors:  Marco Stella; Massimiliano Bissolati; Daniele Gentile; Alessandro Arriciati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-02-18

10.  Surgeon volume versus morbidity and cost in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in an academic community medical center.

Authors:  Timothy J Kennedy; Maria A Cassera; Ronald Wolf; Lee L Swanstrom; Paul D Hansen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.